Genetics: Are we stuck?


All:

A few days ago I noticed, in divulging Al's family tree, that an
unbelievably large amount of the heritage of the giants we are growing has
a very narrow genetic base.  In many of the specimens as much as 70-85% or
so of the parentage (that was known) goes back to only three individuals.  

My question to the group is how do we all percieve this narrow genetic
base? and further......what potential for future gains do we have if we are
mostly just reorganizing and crossing "fairly similar" lines.  In the big
picture are we stuck?  What other types of  C. maxima can we breed into the
giants to give us the extra boost to bring our sport/hobby to the next
level.  

I'm an optimist and I think our next really big goal is the One ton mark
(2000#'s) that is.  Can we get there without some major genetic events?

I hope this message jars some healthy conversation about genetics and
breeding.  For me this time of the year is when I begin to think most about
these issues.  

Oh yea, and Al........you better watch your back side, my wife is ready to
come after you if I sleep with the tree one more night!!!!!


Rick from Wisconsin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index