Re: New Canadian record confirms that heavy pumpkins produce heavy

Matthew
I think there's a picture on the pumpkinnook site.
 http://pumpkinnook.com/giants/club1000.htm
Ron

matthew isom wrote:

> Al Eaton's 1153 further confirms the fact that heavy pumpkins tend to
> produce over-the-charts offspring.
> 1153 Eaton 01--723 Bobier 99(UOW) x 974.5 Eaton 00
>     (8% heavy        14% heavy                    13% heavy)
>
> And since this is the time of year when most of us are wondering what
> might have been and what could be next year, let's indulge in a bit of
> speculation!
> So, the 1153 weighed 8% heavy.  That means that it "should have" weighed
> only 1061 and it would have only weighed 976 if it had been 8% below the
> charts.  Here's the speculation:  what if it had come in 14% over, like
> it's mother did?
> 114% of 1061 is . . . 1209!  At these higher weights you really see what
> a difference 14% makes.  So, maybe this is the year I plant one known to
> go over the charts. My only reservation is that most over-the-charts
> pumpkins aren't all that good-looking, and I really like 'em round and
> orange.  Who can tell me what Al's 1153 looked like?
> Here's an extra credit homework assignment for anyone up to the task:
>     How many percent heavy would the 1153 have to be to weigh 1263#?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Pumpkin-growing FAQ: http://www.hort.net/lists/pumpkins/search.cgi
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
> message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Pumpkin-growing FAQ: http://www.hort.net/lists/pumpkins/search.cgi
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index