Re: INDIANA STATE RECORD
Gus,
You are wrong. Its not the decision of the individuals that were there and
saw the event take place, its the Judges. Judges decision is final. They
deemed it sound, maybe at the IPGA weigh off they would had said its not a
sound pumpkin. Its still a NEW STATE RECORD, but maybe the IPGA should say
its not a IPGA STATE RECORD. To take a record away from someone when your
organization is not involved in the weigh off is wrong. If I was a grower I
would be trying to beat 1097.5 pounds not 896. Judges deemed it sound and
Judges decision is final, a outside individual/organization has no vote or
opinion on the outcome.
I'm not bashing the IPGA but clearly this was a bad judgement call on their
behalf.
drew
----- Original Message -----
From: "Smithhisler, Paul" <Paul.Smithhisler@dnr.state.oh.us>
To: <pumpkins@hort.net>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 12:23 PM
Subject: RE: INDIANA STATE RECORD
> Hold on everyone, Don't go bashing the IPGA leadership. This was/is a
very
> awkward situation that all of us witnessed, including the IPGA leadership.
> I appreciate all the comments made on the subject, as it may help the
> leadership in possibly revising their decision; however it is you who were
> not there and did not observe what happened. The decision should be
solely
> based on the individuals that were there and saw the event take place.
>
> My advice to all, make sure your judges completely inspect the larger
fruit
> before it gets to the scale. Have them physically place their hands on
the
> bottom of the fruit and check for soft areas. Had this been done, there
> would have been less of an argument, but still a controversy. Was the
fruit
> cracked by the handling of the fruit on the scale? Was there an overly
soft
> area that should have disqualified the fruit before it got to the scale?
> There are far too many questions for anyone to adequately answer at this
> point.
>
> In my humble opinion, the fruit was passed by the judges before it made it
> to the scale, the damage was done on the scale. We are splitting hairs in
> trying to disqualify a 1097.5 lb pumpkin over what could have happened a
> minute earlier or a minute later. Regardless of the outcome,
> Congratulations Tom on a fine accomplishment.
>
> -Gus
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patience Van Zandt [t*@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:57 AM
> To: pumpkins@hort.net
> Subject: Re: INDIANA STATE RECORD
>
> I don't live in Indiana, but I gotta tell you, it would be very hard for
me
> to respect an organization that makes decisions like the one announced by
> the IPGA. I equate it with the notion that a jury could return a verdict
> after a trial, and then another person, who had not seen the evidence
> presented at trial, could overturn the jury's verdict. How can you
presume
> to pass judgment on "leakage" that you yourselves did not inspect? And
> since you did not inspect it, why would you disregard the judgment of
those
> who did? Absurd. Shame on you. You need better leadership, it seems to
> me.
>
> Patience
>
>
> >From: "kennedys" <waynekennedy@sprint.ca>
> >Reply-To: pumpkins@hort.net
> >To: <pumpkins@hort.net>
> >Subject: Re: INDIANA STATE RECORD
> >Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 10:12:34 -0400
> >
> >WOW I can't believe this....I feel like quitting.........I can tell you
> >right now if I go to a weigh-off and my fruit is ruled OK and then later
> >and I mean later ruled Exh....that would be it for me and that site or
> >organization.....look I respect you guys but your dead wrong.....now I
can
> >see abit more of what Andrew was trying to say before..didn't agree
totally
>
> >with him but I can see some of his points now.....if Tom thought he had a
> >fruit that was suspect as to soundness I am sure he would have asked the
> >judges to inspect it...fruit can be both damaged from the trip or the
> >weigh-off handlers....they normally do the very best they can....if the
> >Huber site had ANY and I mean any thought to it being suspect they or the
> >judges should have thought very carefully about the impact it would have
> >for the sport first......I believe the IPGA ... OWE's and I mean OWE,s
Tom
> >an apology.......Tom great achievement...new personal best and NEW
INDIANA
> >RECORD.....we all know how hard it is to get a fruit to weigh-off.....Tom
> >if you have another fruit for Oct 5 take it to another site......wayne
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Andrew Papez
> > To: pumpkins@hort.net
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:21 AM
> > Subject: Re: INDIANA STATE RECORD
> >
> >
> > Bruce,
> >
> > I don't understand how the decision of the judges at Hubers Weigh off
> >affect the IPGA'S credibility. Unless:
> >
> > you where a judge
> > Hubers is part of the IPGA
> > Judges at Hubers didn't know what they were looking for
> >
> > By the sounds of it, the fruit wasn't sound or it was sound and was
> >damaged putting it on the scale and the judges didn't inspect it
throughly,
>
> >but if there is no connection between Hubers and the IPGA, you cannot
> >reverse a decision made at another weigh off and I see no way it effects
> >your organization's credibility.
> >
> > Tom's record should stand and by you saying you won't recognize it
does
> >your organization more harm and correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think
> >any organization has governing powers on whether a fruit is a record or
> >not.
> >
> > The only question mark(credibility factor) will fall on Huber's Weigh
> >off and not on the IPGA.
> >
> > Tom congradulations on the New Indiana State Record 1097.5 pounds.
> >
> > andrew
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: brewc3
> > To: pumpkins@hort.net
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:21 PM
> > Subject: INDIANA STATE RECORD
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear Growers,
> >
> > The IPGA Board has came to a decision on Tom Beachy's New state
> >record. We will not be recognizing this as the new record . Our ruling
has
> >been a hard decision . Tom is one of the top
> > growers in Indiana & the first 1000+ in state . Under the rules
this
>
> >pumpkin passed an intial
> > inspection but it started leaking pumpkin juice on the scale. This
we
> >feel as a group is not a sound fruit. The weight was recorded at HUBERS
> >weigh-off & won first prize. The judges at the show allowed the weight to
> >stand at the show. As a fairly new growers association we do not want the
> >integrity or credability of our group to be comprimised with the "judges"
> >decision making. Hopefully all will understand our decision at this time.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bruce Gatewood
> > President IPGA
> > brewc3@prodigy.net
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> http://www.hotmail.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Pumpkin-growing FAQ: http://www.hort.net/lists/pumpkins/search.cgi
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
> message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Pumpkin-growing FAQ: http://www.hort.net/lists/pumpkins/search.cgi
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
> message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Pumpkin-growing FAQ: http://www.hort.net/lists/pumpkins/search.cgi
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS
