Re: INDIANA STATE RECORD/ Integrity ?
- Subject: Re: INDIANA STATE RECORD/ Integrity ?
- From: "Greg Sanchez" j*@hotmail.com
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 10:46:50 -0700
- List-archive: <http://www.hort.net/lists/pumpkins/> (Web Archive)
If the pumpkin would have lasted one more hour it most definately would have been offical. And that doesn't change the fact that it was rotting inside. I don't think this is a matter of if there was interal rot, but at what time did it show itself externally. If it didn't show up until after the weighing, I say his record should be offical, regardless of how long after the weighing the interal rot showed itself externally.
----Original Message Follows----
From: Bill VanIderstine <harrow.fur@pei.sympatico.ca>
Reply-To: pumpkins@hort.net
To: pumpkins@hort.net
Subject: Re: INDIANA STATE RECORD/ Integrity ?
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 21:27:26 -0300
Wayne: Time to drop it : 1 to 2 gallons leaking onto scales; what does it have to do, leak onto
you before you realize it's not normal & meeting the rules as written at present.
At 09:03 PM 9/25/02, you wrote:
Brad my friend you said it started to leak at the time of the second lift to remove the remaining tarp....thats when they should have stopped it from being official..am I wrong about when it leaked....believe thats how you explained it in your e-mail to the list....ok Brad what did you say to them ...did you explain that the judges could rule it unsound before the weight became official.....an for influencing the decision...YES you had a right to all growers to make it clear to the judges that a unsound fruit could not qualify....1-2 gallons is not clear enough.....sorry Brad I can't see your view here.....as for dropping the ball I am sure you know.............wayne
----- Original Message -----
From: <B*@aol.com>Brad2julie@aol.com
To: <p*@hort.net>pumpkins@hort.net
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: INDIANA STATE RECORD/ Integrity ?
Wayne,
Tom is also my friend just as you are. He already knows I can't stand this whole thing. I did confer with the judges as the site coordinator before a final decision was made. But one thing is for sure, I am not going to influence that decision one way or another. Any of you who think I should have need to review your ethics. I am the Site Coordinator not a judge. The judges looked at it from a couple different angles. Yes, it started leaking while still on the scale but it also passed their full inspection 30 seconds prior to that. They chose to call it official. So for you to suggest that I somehow dropped the ball. Well, I am still trying to get a grasp on that one.
Brad
_________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- Pumpkin-growing FAQ: http://www.hort.net/lists/pumpkins/search.cgi To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS
- Prev by Date: Re: INDIANA STATE RECORD
- Next by Date: RE: INDIANA STATE RECORD/ Integrity ?
- Previous by thread: Re: INDIANA STATE RECORD/ Integrity ?
- Next by thread: RE: INDIANA STATE RECORD/ Integrity ?