This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: More on imminent Judgicide:
- To: "Michael Cohill" <m*@neo.lrun.com>, <P*@athenet.net>
- Subject: Re: More on imminent Judgicide:
- From: "* b* <d*@saltspring.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 09:12:56 -0700
Well, apparently what's in a name is a blue ribbon and a trophy!
>>calling a Conn. field pumpkin "a pumpkin"
> instead of a squash is an arbitray call by some judge that doesn't know
> there is no such thing, no scientific or biological classification of a
> pumpkin.
Could you elaborate on this? Sounds like the kind of ammunition I need to
send to him!
Still fumin'!
Denise McCann Beck
USDA Zone 7
Sunset Western 4
Coastal Bristish Columbia
----------
> From: Michael Cohill <mcohill@neo.lrun.com>
> To: denise beck <denise@saltspring.com>; Pumpkins@athenet.net
> Subject: Re: More on imminent Judgicide:
> Date: September 22, 1997 6:11 AM
>
> Denise:
> A 39 pound field pumpkin is a whooper, no doubt about it! That's about
> the same as an 850 pound Atlantic Giant. It is pushing the envelope of
its
> genetic potential. However, calling a Conn. field pumpkin "a pumpkin"
> instead of a squash is an arbitray call by some judge that doesn't know
> there is no such thing, no scientific or biological classification of a
> pumpkin.
> What's in a name - a pumpkin by anyother name would smell as... sweet?
>
> Michael in Akron
> mcohill@neo.lrun.com
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index