This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: More on imminent Judgicide:
- To: Michael Cohill <m*@neo.lrun.com>
- Subject: Re: More on imminent Judgicide:
- From: n*@ideasign.com (Chris R Wilbers)
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 22:00:38 -0500
- References: <199709221506.KAA22064@mail.athenet.net>
Michael Cohill wrote:
>
> Denise:
> A 39 pound field pumpkin is a whooper, no doubt about it! That's about
> the same as an 850 pound Atlantic Giant. It is pushing the envelope of its
> genetic potential. However, calling a Conn. field pumpkin "a pumpkin"
> instead of a squash is an arbitray call by some judge that doesn't know
> there is no such thing, no scientific or biological classification of a
> pumpkin.
> What's in a name - a pumpkin by anyother name would smell as... sweet?
>
> Michael in Akron
> mcohill@neo.lrun.com
This brings up a question I wondered about as I was at Topsfield last
year and saw the various pumpkins on display: What exactly is the
definition of a FIELD PUMPKIN. This designation was present on a number
of pumpkins on display there. How is a field pumpkin different from an
Atlantic Giant...or put another way, why is an Atlantic Giant not a
field pumpkin?
Regards,
Chris Wilbers
Sioux Falls, SD
References:
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index