This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
germination test results
- To: s*@eskimo.net
- Subject: germination test results
- From: C*@webtv.net
- Date: Sun, 6 Apr 1997 12:46:41 -0700
- Resent-Date: Sun, 6 Apr 1997 12:46:49 -0700
- Resent-From: seeds-list@eskimo.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"H2jMu1.0.cE.ds_Hp"@mx1>
- Resent-Sender: seeds-list-request@eskimo.com
Outside of Plant World, which is smaller scale and therefore
receives more personal care than the large homogenous feilds, does
anyone know if the comparisons going on weren't conducted on seed that
came from the same grower? There ARE
others involved in the food chain, including the USDA. My foot is still
a mile in my mouth with Alan Bradshaw over an unfortunate printed remark
about some Salvia seed. Turned out to be the USPS's fault and I'll
probably be plugging Alplains for a year before I make it up to him.
Any idea whom the grower is more liable to pass on a lower quality
fraction to, someone well-heeled who can presumably weather this better,
or someone who will more likely bite back because they aren't?
I'm also kind of curious to know howT&M are about refunds, with all this
discontent, having never asked for one myself. I am discounting several
real instances of bad T&M seed because the package actually came right
and and said so, and gave special instructions to compensate for it,
along with extra seed as well.
Also, does anyone know what that bright blue mold is that seems to
invariably break out on much English seed if the conditions are not
"just so?" (Plant World seed HAS consistently been an exception to
this.)
Rob
Follow-Ups:
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index