This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Gib vs Auxin
- To: s*@eskimo.com
- Subject: Gib vs Auxin
- From: C*@webtv.net
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 1997 20:21:26 -0700
- Resent-Date: Wed, 9 Apr 1997 20:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: seeds-list@eskimo.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"FT-d92.0.552.As5Jp"@mx2>
- Resent-Sender: seeds-list-request@eskimo.com
Like Mr. McAlpine, I of course only post to stimulate activity on the
list since I actually know everything (JUST KIDDING!) but I am
wondering what anyone would have to say to someone with the following
point of view:
"Auxin must be a germinating hormone as well as a rooting hormone
because that is the first thing that seeds do when they germinate, make
a root, and conversely, therefore, gibberellin must be a rooting
hormone"
Has anyone EVER heard of artificially-applied auxins, rather than
gibberellins having any positive effect on germination? Why might this
be unlikely, technically? Might there be life-forms in the soil which
manufacture or excrete auxin?
Many thanks.
Rob
Follow-Ups:
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index