This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Thank you for your comments......
- To: s*@eskimo.com
- Subject: Thank you for your comments......
- From: D* M* <m*@eskimo.com>
- Date: Sat, 08 Feb 1997 13:34:05 +0000
- References: <199702081755.JAA11256@pacific.telebyte.com>
- Resent-Date: Sat, 8 Feb 1997 13:33:44 -0800
- Resent-From: seeds-list@eskimo.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"flIz13.0.oC.t4F_o"@mx1>
- Resent-Sender: seeds-list-request@eskimo.com
After reading the comments from the members and the below note, I can
now understand why some people need to know about seed
sources. As stated in earlier postings, I don’t mind if you request a
seed
source but I would appreciate the propagation method of that seed.
On the issue of rules, I will post a new guidelines (if I decide to do
it) on:
http://www.eskimo.com/~mcalpin/seed.html SAVE THIS AS A BOOKMARK!
>
> OK...I will step in here and put in my 2cents.
>
> Firstly, I agree with the fact that you own the list and therefore you can
> make and enforce the rules. As one ex-member put it....it's your
> backyard. You do all the behind the scenes work which I am quite sure most
> list members do not understand and have given little thought as to how much
> you do as a listowner and what a pain it is to do.
>
> An aside regarding "rules".....after reading the "manual" for xxxxxx-l, I
> am quite sure I will lurk there for a long time and not likely contribute.
> When I suggested rules for our group I was not suggestion we write
> something like that, which seems to approach the new South African
> constitution in it's thoroughness and complexity.
>
> Anyway....I DO think that seed/plant sources is a part of propagation.
> What are you going to propagate if you don't have the plant. To me it is
> not nearly as enjoyable nor useful to read/discuss the intricacies of the
> propagation techniques of a plant, particularly one that is new to me or I
> don't currently have without some idea of where I can get it. I admit to
> being an information collector..but when it comes to plants I also want the
> plant.
>
> Here is an analogy of sorts......you go to the RSF or the Bellevue Botanic
> Garden....you see a plant that just sends you into an orgasmic frenzy, you
> have to have it.....you ask about it. No one knows anything..or no, you
> cant' have any and no, there are no sources for it. That to me is like
> taking a chocoholic who has developed diabetes and putting them in a Fanny
> Farmers store. Cruel and unusual punishment IMHO.
>
> Quite frankly, one of the biggest criticisms I level at public gardens, and
> I do this openly at Botanic Garden meetings I attend...is the dangling of
> carrots in front of people who are truly interested in plants, (not the, Oh
> what pretty petunias crowd) and then essentially say that they can never
> get one. I definitely am not saying that every rare and neat plant should
> be available a KMart! If that were so, I'd probably would be far less
> interested in collecting plants. What drives collecting for some is the
> "hunt" and the eventual capture of the prey....but there has to be some
> hope.
>
> Even for me....a somewhat successful propagator and someone who knows that
> somewhere out there I can find a source for the new plant that has captured
> my attention....will loose interest sooner or later when I can't find a
> source. The Internet allows for some greater ease of searching but still
> takes a lot of time that I really don't have, and I am not going to sift
> through hardcopy looking for obscure nurseries in Botswana that will take
> 2 months to hear from and so forth. The computer age has developed a
> mindset for relatively quick answers....that is why we have these lists in
> the first place. I have a question, I can get an answer rather quickly
> without having to have the library at Kew at my disposal. Same for
> sources...I don't need to have nor sift through dozens of catalogs looking
> for one that has some new Arum sp. listed. In fact xxxxx-l ( forgot if you
> are a member) just had a bunch of people post notes from catalogs they got
> saying so-and-so has this-or-that. In fact it seems like xxxxx-l and the
> xxxxxxx plant list both routinely discuss sources, certainly to my
> appreciation.
>
> To paraphrase Mr. Spock, I understand and can appreciate where you are
> coming from, though I disagree with you.
>
> BTW..you also need a really good set of asbestos underwear to be a
> listowner and simply blow off most everything that is sent to you in a
> non-constructive manner. I personally don't have that thick a skin and the
> asbestos is too itchy. ;-)
>
> OK so it was more like 5cents....keep the change...
> You have a good day, don't jump ship quite yet but I for one wouldn't blame
> you if you do decide to drop the list. I'm sure you don't get enough kudos
> and thanks to put up with
> all the chaff you get.
>
> Thanks Duncan!
--
Duncan McAlpine, Federal Way, WA
Why buy plants when you can grow them yourself.....?
http://www.eskimo.com/~mcalpin/
http://www.eskimo.com/~mcalpin/pumkin.html
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index