This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: seeds-digest Digest V98 #34
- To: s*@eskimo.com
- Subject: Re: seeds-digest Digest V98 #34
- From: M* <M*@aol.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 17:55:37 EST
- Resent-Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 14:58:15 -0800 (PST)
- Resent-From: seeds-list@eskimo.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"lcRSH1.0.9A.0G71r"@mx2>
- Resent-Sender: seeds-list-request@eskimo.com
Now I am confused as these two replies seem to be in conflict. For a
brief moment I thought that I had something new to try as a planting
medium when I am concerned about water retention but now I am not sure
what I have. Has anyone actually used Turface?
>Turface is a product that is used extensively on athletic fields,
>expecially baseball and softball fields. It is a product that is composed
>primariily of sand. This product is used as the infield material on
>baseball and softball fields. Turface does not have many horticultural
>applications.
"Turface" is a calcined-clay product that's marketed as a
drainage-enhancement soil amendment. It seems to be especially aimed at
the golf-course market. Chances are that your garden center could find
it, if they're willing to special-order.
There was a lot of discussion of this product as a seed "compost" on
Alpine-L last spring. Its main advantage would seem to be in plunge-bed
systems, since it apparently doesn't get water-logged.
w martin
myg1728@aol.com
http://www.oakmediacreations.com/myg/index.html
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index