This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: [SG] Cimicifuga
- To: s*@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU
- Subject: Re: [SG] Cimicifuga
- From: R* D* <d*@INDIANA.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 08:30:51 -0500
Thanks for the research, John! None of my books even HAD ramosa. However,
you didn't mention bloom--did the books disregard this? Re your comment
below, they should NOT be at the same stage of development if one blooms
in July and one in October. So I continue to have hope for my ramosa--or
whatever it is.
Gee, among us we probably have quite a horticultural library!
Bobbi Diehl
Bloomington, IN
zone 5/6
On Tue, 16 Jun 1998, John M Ford wrote:
> Given that C. racemosa
> is only slightly more hardy than C. ramosa (discounting the z9
> rating as an error), I tend to think that they should be roughly
> at the same stage of their annual growth and at a similar size.
>
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index