Re: [SG] Subject lines

---

• To: s*@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU
• Subject: Re: [SG] Subject lines
• From: C* <C*@AOL.COM>
• Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 16:20:17 EST

In a message dated 98-03-26 07:15:55 EST, Bobbi  wrote:

<<  Or is there some reason why you must include "Re:"? >>
Hi Bobbi,

Doesn't the "Re:" indicate that the post is in answer to a post? If we do away
with the "Re:", I would favor , in an answer to a posting, that we include
something like "Reply" in the subject line. Just a thought.

Clyde Crockett ccredux@aol.com z5 Indianapolis IN

• Prev by Date: [SG] dividing
• Next by Date: Re: [SG] Dividing Hostas
• Prev by thread: Re: [SG] Subject lines
• Next by thread: [SG] LAST ONE OUT!