Re: [SG] Rhododendrons
- To: s*@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU
- Subject: Re: [SG] Rhododendrons
- From: B* <r*@IDIRECT.COM>
- Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 21:37:50 -0500
Nancy, this list is a compilation from a few sources (but primarily from
Richard Brooks; thank you Richard). Rhodos that reportedly do reasonably
well at minimal light levels are marked with an asterisk. Is anyone able to
add to this list (or perhaps take issue with some of the entries)?
calendulaceum
carolinianum, including 'album'
kaempferi
kiusianum
schlippenbachii *
williamsianum
'Alumni Day'
'Barbara Ann' *
'Ben Moseley'
'Dexter's Purple'
'Firestorm'
'Great Eastern'
'Hachmann's Polaris'
'Holden'
'Jonathan Shaw'
'King George'
'Mary Belle'
'Parker's Pink'
'Pink Flourish'
'Rochelle'
'Scarlet Romance'
'Schneebukett'
'Snow Lady' *
'Spring Glory'
'Vivacious'
Bob Ramik
Toronto area, Ontario, Canada
At 08:32 PM 25/03/1999 , you wrote:
>From: Nancy Stedman [s*@INTERPORT.NET]
>Sent: Thursday, March 25, 1999 5:44 PM
>To: shadegardens@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU
>Subject: [SG] Rhododendrons
>
>
>Hi. Does anyone know of a rhodie that will bloom in pretty serious shade?
