Re: Corydalis
- To: s*@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU
- Subject: Re: [SG] Corydalis
- From: R* D*
- Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 08:36:28 -0500
Paul, where are you getting this up-to-the-minute info, or is it a secret?
If not, would you please share your source? Is there a periodical (it
would practically have to be a weekly!) giving the latest nomenclature
changes that one could subscribe to, like the Wall Street Journal???
Bobbi Diehl
Bloomington, IN
zone 5/6
On Sat, 25 Sep 1999, Paul Henjum wrote:
> 6.Pseudofumaria lutea (L.) Borkh.
> Family: Papaveraceae
> Genus: Pseudofumaria
> Species: lutea
> Rank: species
> Reference: Arch. Bot. (Roemer) 1: 45 (1797)
> Name status: Accepted
> Synonym(s):
> Corydalis lutea (L.) DC.
>
> Cordalis lutea has also been moved into Pseudofumaria too.
>
> So the proper names are now.
>
> Pseudofumaria lutea which was Cortdalis lutea
> Pseudofumaria alba which was Corydalis ochroleuca.
>
> They did this to me before, I used to know all the names for the native
> Orchids that grew in Minnesota and there diffrent subspecies and forms
> (around 70 or more) then they changed all the names from the ones I learned.
>
> Paul
>
