sibtosa or setsib

Of course, Christy, it was my mistake concerning finding one SJ among your JS seedlings. But probably theoretically the variant with obtaining SJs is also possible and it means my questions to the audience are still here. To be correct I should ask about your sibtosa cultivars - one of them (according information from your site) is setsib. The same question to everybody: should we use both terms for the results of such crosses or only one (what one exactly)?
    As to 28- and 40-chrom groups, let me make more precise what I wrote about absence of logic here. I don't know if both the groups should belong to the same class or not (as far as I know, in the AIS, officially, they are) since I'm not a botanist, I have no knowledge in genetics and I even don't know if we can consider the groups of the same phenotype or not. But if they belong to the the same class, the part of the class shouldn't have the name identical with the name of the whole class. Our first task, it seems to me, is not to find fine name(s) but follow logic in everything we do. If we find more felicitous name for sino-siberians, we won't solve the problem I wrote about -we'll still have the name "siberians" for the 28-chrom group and for the whole class at the same time. To be logical we should choose another name for 28-chrom group or decide they are two different classes.

Sergey



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


To post to Sibrob: sibrob@yahoogroups.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index