Re: virus's (viri?)

---

• Subject: Re: virus's (viri?)
• From: N*
• Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 10:01:47 +0800
• Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 19:17:48 -0700
• Resent-From: v*@eskimo.com
• Resent-Message-ID: <"iXgbM.0.Xx1.BzlYx"@mx1>
• Resent-Sender: v*@eskimo.com

Sure, what happened?
----- Original Message -----
From: Patrick Callahan <pac1@tiac.net>
To: <veggie-list@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 7:39 AM
Subject: Re: virus's (viri?)


> On Monday 27 August 2001 04:02, David Frank Hall wrote:
> > This may have been covered but if not here goes, why use attachments,
why
> > not just paste into the body of the mail?
>
> Exactly what I do.  I don't send images, html, .doc files  or any other
such
> stuff just text.
>
> Can we talk about why my tomatoes failed again? ;-)
>
> Pat
>

• References:
  • Re: Zenggualing
    • From: s*
  • Re: Zenggualing
    • From: r* f*
  • Re: virus's (viri?)
    • From: "D* F* H*"
  • Re: virus's (viri?)
    • From: P* C*

• Prev by Date: Re: virus's (viri?)
• Next by Date: Re: failed toms was virus's (viri?)
• Prev by thread: Re: virus's (viri?)
• Next by thread: Re: failed toms was virus's (viri?)