Re: virus's (viri?)

---

• Subject: Re: virus's (viri?)
• From: P* C*
• Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 19:39:55 -0400
• Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:39:47 -0700
• Resent-From: v*@eskimo.com
• Resent-Message-ID: <"kjpyW.0.c33.2fjYx"@mx1>
• Resent-Sender: v*@eskimo.com

On Monday 27 August 2001 04:02, David Frank Hall wrote:
> This may have been covered but if not here goes, why use attachments, why
> not just paste into the body of the mail?

Exactly what I do.  I don't send images, html, .doc files  or any other such 
stuff just text.

Can we talk about why my tomatoes failed again? ;-)

Pat

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: failed toms was virus's (viri?)
    • From: "D* F* H*"
  • Re: virus's (viri?)
    • From: "N*"

• References:
  • Re: Zenggualing
    • From: s*
  • Re: Zenggualing
    • From: r* f*
  • Re: virus's (viri?)
    • From: "D* F* H*"

• Prev by Date: Re: Picking Peas
• Next by Date: Re: virus's (viri?)
• Prev by thread: Re: virus's (viri?)
• Next by thread: Re: virus's (viri?)