Re: identification (2)

---

• Subject: Re: identification (2)
• From: D* M* <l*@wi.rr.com>
• Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 05:02:30 -0500

Good Morning Fred (and glad to see the list is still alive),

You use the term "cultivar".  Is this a plant of which we already know the
genus (Acer, for example)?  Is there any more information with which you can
supply us?  Very unusual looking, to say the least.


Don Martinson
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Mailto:llmen@wi.rr.com








On 5/27/10 4:02 AM, "Friedrich Lauria" <friedrich.lauria@aon.at> wrote:

> Hello everyone,
> 
> could someone please identify this leaf ? a cultivar ?
> 
> sorry, the attachment has been removed by the server. To see the photo,
> please follow one of the following free links:
> 
> http://www.gmx.de/mc/9Ez5VK6g5uIfy8AzyEqy9JOJOS1qOt
> and click the button "GMX MedieCenter starten"
> 
> or
> 
> http://rapidshare.com/files/392037953/leaf0001.jpg
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Fred
> 
> [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name
> of leaf0001.jpg]
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
> message text UNSUBSCRIBE WOODYPLANTS

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE WOODYPLANTS

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: identification (2)
    • From: F* L* &*

• References:
  • identification (2)
    • From: F* L* &*

• Prev by Date: identification (2)
• Next by Date: Re: identification (2)
• Previous by thread: identification (2)
• Next by thread: Re: identification (2)