hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Anchomanes ID, root quest.

Hey aroiders, Two questions as follows:

A couple years ago I bought a couple of Anchomanes... 2 A. hookeri and 2 A.
welwitschii. My problem is this, only one label was sent for each species
and the labels were jumbled in the box when they came. I stuck the two
labels into two of the four pots. OK so far?  Well now they are coming out
of dormancy and I have put the two different labels into two pots of the
same species. So this is a which is which question.

One Anchomanes has now leafed out and the other species leaf blade is still
curled tight. But here is the difference. The species that is already
leafed out has a glaucus bloom on the petiole. The other species petiole
has no bloom on it. I hope this is enough for an ID between these two
species. If not I will wait till the leaf completely unfurls and go from

Second question...

I am having an argument on another list. Can anyone help me? I have never
heard of any plant anywhere that has roots that could be considered
phototropic. Is this a correct assumption??

Thanks for the help, 


 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index