hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: [Aroid-l] Thyphonium nubicum vs Typhonium venosum 'Indian Giant'?

On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Brian Williams wrote:

> This giant form is different in over all size my plant of the regular form
> grow to 1 to 2 feet while this Indian Giant form grows to 4 feet tall or more.
> The stems are different as well the regular form is highly spotted while the
> giant form has much fewer spotting. The leaves on the giant form also tend to
> be wider as well and less dissected as the more common form. The flowers as
> far as I can tell at identical and this may be just a odd selected seedling or
> a tetraploid. Here are some photos showing the differences.

I've seen several plants matching Brian's description, and even have one 
myself, a gift from a friend several years ago. I'd add to his description 
that the substance of the leaf is much greater than the "regular" form.

I've wondered if they are all indeed a clone, or not clones but closely 
related, or a number of unrelated clones selected for similar 
characteristics. But short of my wife winning that big lottery and 
outfitting the lab of my dreams, or Ronco producing a "Mr. DNA Lab" ....

And while mine gets up to 4 feet (1.3 meters) or a bit more, I've seen 
some that had to be close to 6 feet (2 meters), tall enough to pretty much 
look you right in the eyes. Maybe it was just better cultivation, but to 
me it looked more like they were an even larger clone (or clones).


-- Steve Marak
-- samarak@gizmoworks.com
Aroid-L mailing list

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement