Re: Aroid systematics


Hello again.
 
I think I'm answering to myself:
Another document I've found shows the cladogram I know.
 
Marek
----- Original Message -----
From: a*@wp.pl
To: aroid-l@gizmoworks.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 4:35 PM
Subject: [Aroid-l] Aroid systematics

Hello,
 
In my site there's a page with Araceae systematics,
I think it is out of date.
 
Today I read a document from 2008
and I found there that the subfamily Monsteroideae is now tribes Monstereae and Spathiphylleae
within the subfamily Pothoideae.
 
Philodendron is not in Aroideae, but in it's own subfamily Philodendroideae (with tribes Philodendreae, Montrichardieae
and I don't know what else). Maybe Homalomeneae too?
 
Can anyone confirm this is true?
Where can I find an up to date systematics?
 
Please help,
Marek


_______________________________________________
Aroid-L mailing list
Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com
http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l



Nie znaleziono virusa w tej wiadomości przychodzącej.
Sprawdzone przez AVG - www.avg.com
Wersja: 8.5.435 / Baza danych wirusów: 271.1.1/2707 - Data wydania: 02/24/10 07:34:00
_______________________________________________
Aroid-L mailing list
Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com
http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l


Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index