Re: Amorphophallus titanum
- Subject: Re: Amorphophallus titanum
- From: &* A* <a*@wp.pl>
- Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 04:50:15 +0100
|
Dear Eduardo,
A good point.
The suffix -um is neutral and
it fits to all grammatic genera:
Also feminine botanical genera species epithet can
end with -um,
the examples are: Arisaema
triphyllum, Alocasia scalprum, Aglaonema commutatum, Syngonium
auritum...
But indeed, I have never heard
another construction like Amorphophallus titanum.
I always wondered why Alocasia
macrorrhizos is a proper name, the epithet is of Greek
origin,
and I don't know why it is named so. The
suffix -os is masculine in Greek, and Alocasia is
feminine.
And what do you think about the name
Synandrospadix vermitoxicus?
I can't find anywhere what is the gender of the
word "spadix". Isn't it feminine?
There is also one important note,
many people erroneously take genera ending
with -is as masculine, but it is feminine,
Ariopsis peltata or in other families
Iris pumila, Clematis lanuginosa etc.
Also the genera ending with -as are feminine:
Anubias gigantea, Zamioculcas zamiifolia, Cycas revoluta.
But... the pine tree, Pinus seems to be a
masculine word, and we have Pinus sylvestris, P. excelsa, P.
nigra,
while some other species of pine end usually
with -us: like Pinus strobus.
Strange things...
Marek
|
_______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Amorphophallus titanum
- From: A* H* &*
- Re: Amorphophallus titanum
- References:
- Amorphophallus titanum
- From: E* G* G* &*
- Amorphophallus titanum
- Prev by Date: Re: Amorphophallus titanum
- Next by Date: Re: Zantedeschia
- Previous by thread: Re: Amorphophallus titanum
- Next by thread: Re: Amorphophallus titanum