Re: New aroid in western Australia? Typhonium on thescaffold !!
- Subject: Re: New aroid in western Australia? Typhonium on thescaffold !!
- From: Alistair Hay <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 18:17:05 -0500
I am longing to see if you are going to publish an unrecognisable genus :))))
On 06/02/2011, at 3:10 AM, "Wilbert Hetterscheid" <email@example.com> wrote:
> oooh, I am deeply ashamed. This is indeed true. I was writing in the spur of
> the moment I guess. Indeed, Peter and I did not recombine L. mirabile to T.
> mirabile but you youirself, the Inventor of Lazarum. Must feel good to have
> this name reinstated gain, I guess.
> Thus far it seems quite difficult indeed to separate Lazarum from Typhonium
> s.str. Distinguishing Sauromatum s.l. from Typhonium s.str. works [sort of]
> (see Flora of China and the Cusimano et al. paper).
>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>> Van: firstname.lastname@example.org
>> [mailto:email@example.com] Namens Alistair Hay
>> Verzonden: donderdag 3 februari 2011 3:24
>> Aan: Discussion of aroids
>> Onderwerp: Re: [Aroid-l] New aroid in western Australia?
>> Typhonium on thescaffold !!
>> Thanks Wilbert :) but one tiny point of correction. It is
>> Typhonium mirabile (A. Hay) A. Hay... If you made the same
>> combination in 2000, yours is an isonym....
>> You are very polite about the Japanese paper. I am astonished
>> it was published in systematic botany at all.
>> What will be intriguing will be to see how these molecular
>> clades are going to be dstinguished morphologically.
> Aroid-L mailing list
Aroid-L mailing list
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |