Re: New aroid in western Australia? Typhonium on thescaffold !!


I am longing to see if you are going to publish an unrecognisable genus :))))

On 06/02/2011, at 3:10 AM, "Wilbert Hetterscheid" <hetter@xs4all.nl> wrote:

> oooh, I am deeply ashamed. This is indeed true. I was writing in the spur of
> the moment I guess. Indeed, Peter and I did not recombine L. mirabile to T.
> mirabile but you youirself, the Inventor of Lazarum. Must feel good to have
> this name reinstated gain, I guess. 
> 
> Thus far it seems quite difficult indeed to separate Lazarum from Typhonium
> s.str. Distinguishing Sauromatum s.l. from Typhonium s.str. works [sort of]
> (see Flora of China and the Cusimano et al. paper). 
> 
> Cheers,
> Wilbert
> 
> 
>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>> Van: aroid-l-bounces@gizmoworks.com 
>> [aroid-l-bounces@gizmoworks.com] Namens Alistair Hay
>> Verzonden: donderdag 3 februari 2011 3:24
>> Aan: Discussion of aroids
>> Onderwerp: Re: [Aroid-l] New aroid in western Australia? 
>> Typhonium on thescaffold !!
>> 
>> Thanks Wilbert :) but one tiny point of correction. It is 
>> Typhonium mirabile (A. Hay) A. Hay... If you made the same 
>> combination in 2000, yours is an isonym....
>> 
>> You are very polite about the Japanese paper. I am astonished 
>> it was published in systematic botany at all.
>> 
>> What will be intriguing will be to see how these molecular 
>> clades are going to be dstinguished morphologically.
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aroid-L mailing list
> Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com
> http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
> 
_______________________________________________
Aroid-L mailing list
Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com
http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index