Re: New aroid in western Australia? Typhonium on thescaffold !!
- Subject: Re: New aroid in western Australia? Typhonium on thescaffold !!
- From: "Wilbert Hetterscheid" <email@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 09:10:39 +0100
oooh, I am deeply ashamed. This is indeed true. I was writing in the spur of
the moment I guess. Indeed, Peter and I did not recombine L. mirabile to T.
mirabile but you youirself, the Inventor of Lazarum. Must feel good to have
this name reinstated gain, I guess.
Thus far it seems quite difficult indeed to separate Lazarum from Typhonium
s.str. Distinguishing Sauromatum s.l. from Typhonium s.str. works [sort of]
(see Flora of China and the Cusimano et al. paper).
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: firstname.lastname@example.org
> [mailto:email@example.com] Namens Alistair Hay
> Verzonden: donderdag 3 februari 2011 3:24
> Aan: Discussion of aroids
> Onderwerp: Re: [Aroid-l] New aroid in western Australia?
> Typhonium on thescaffold !!
> Thanks Wilbert :) but one tiny point of correction. It is
> Typhonium mirabile (A. Hay) A. Hay... If you made the same
> combination in 2000, yours is an isonym....
> You are very polite about the Japanese paper. I am astonished
> it was published in systematic botany at all.
> What will be intriguing will be to see how these molecular
> clades are going to be dstinguished morphologically.
Aroid-L mailing list
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |