Re: [aroid-l] A. spruceanum

---

• Subject: Re: [aroid-l] A. spruceanum
• From: "Wilbert Hetterscheid (prive)" h*@worldonline.nl
• Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 05:32:02 +0100
• Importance: Normal

Hi Rand,

This is a bit of a puzzling message: if A. stands for Amorphophallus, then
there's something wrong with the name because Amorphophallus spruceanum
doesn't exist. I did also send Dracontium spruceanum to some of you but
that's hardly an Amorph and Dracontiums do NOT make foliar bulbils, although
they DO develop swollen joints in the leaves to some degree.

Cheerio,
Wilbert


> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: aroid-l-owner@lists.ncsu.edu
> [a*@lists.ncsu.edu]Namens Rand Nicholson
> Verzonden: woensdag 28 januari 2004 19:49
> Aan: aroid-l@lists.ncsu.edu
> Onderwerp: [aroid-l] A. spruceanum
>
>
> Hello All:
>
> My A. spruceanum, which I received with Wilbert's last
> shipment (thank you Wilbert), seems to be developing a tuber
> on the leaf just like A. bulbifer. Is this common?
>
> Rand Nicholson
> Maritime Canada z 5b

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [aroid-l] A. spruceanum
    • From: R* N*

• References:
  • [aroid-l] A. spruceanum
    • From: R* N*

• Prev by Date: [aroid-l] A. spruceanum
• Next by Date: [aroid-l] My friend's trip home to Sri Lanka
• Previous by thread: [aroid-l] A. spruceanum
• Next by thread: Re: [aroid-l] A. spruceanum