RE: Dracontium ID
- Subject: RE: Dracontium ID
- From: "Wilbert Hetterscheid" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 16:02:30 -0500 (CDT)
Look it up in the Genera of Araceae, a standard work everyone of this group
should owe by now.
But here is help: Dracontiums have scaly floral parts surrounding the
stamens and the pistil. Pycnospatha does not, every flower is just stamens
and a pistil. Happy now?
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]Namens Albert
> Verzonden: vrijdag 27 juli 2001 21:27
> Aan: Multiple recipients of list AROID-L
> Onderwerp: Re: Dracontium ID
> Hello Folks,
> I would like to thank everyone who answered my question
> concerning the
> identification of my plant, formerly labeled D. gigas.
> It would appear that I have been given 3 diagnoses: D.
> prancei ( the current
> favorite ), D. polyphyllum, and Pycnospatha arietina.
> Looking at the pictures that our esteemed friend G. Zhu has
> on the aroid.org
> webpage, there is certainly a resemblance to D. prancei more than D.
> polyphyllum, but I would like to revisit Denis' diagnosis of
> a possible match
> with P. arietina. In particular, the reason for my concern
> is that the shape
> of the spathe of my plant doesn't quite seem to match either
> of the suggested
> Dracontiums. The tip of the spathe is definitely curved over
> until it points
> almost towards the ground, which is not the case with the
> suggested dracontium
> I have been unable to find a lot of references to
> Pycnospatha, but looking at
> the drawings and description in _Genera_of_Araceae_, it looks
> like it might be
> a good match.
> Does anyone know of a simple diagnostic difference between
> Dracontium and
> Pycnospatha other than locality?
> Albert Huntington San Jose, CA U.S.A.
> Visit my greenhouse at:
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with
> Yahoo! Messenger