hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: Fiction of bullate leaves

  • Subject: Re: Fiction of bullate leaves
  • From: Jason Hernandez <jason.hernandez74@yahoo.com>
  • Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 03:02:33 +0000 (UTC)

It may be that bullate leaves have different functions in different taxa. But Jonathan may have hit upon something: a mutation that provides no disadvantage may persist, even if it also provides no advantage. Natural selection works solely by differential reproductive success. If a mutant form has the same reproductive success as a "normal" form, there may be no selective pressure for or against it. Founder effects can then come into play: a few mutants among a large population of "normals" may be genetically swamped and disappear; but if the mutant form appears in a new site, away from "normals," then it can become the "normal" for that location. Evolution is not random, but much of it is stochastic.

Jason Hernandez

Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 23:26:31 +0000
From: "Ertelt, Jonathan B" <jonathan.ertelt@Vanderbilt.Edu>
Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] Fiction of bullate leaves
To: Discussion of aroids <aroid-l@www.gizmoworks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"


I think that part of the frustration you're experiencing may be due to the plant's nature not to be mobile - this may initially sound quite absurd, and have little to nothing to do with bullate leaves, but I think that part of the much more sedentary nature of plants is that some evolutionary quirks have come and gone, while others have developed and stayed, even though a specific functionality is not always present, or in some cases is no longer present. When speed and various types of movement are particularly significant to survival, there's more often the case of gradual elimination of traits not crucial. Of course it could be argued the other way - that since there's no movement then the elimination of traits no longer needed in a microhabitat that is drier or higher light would happen more quickly - but of course the randomness of the genetic shift has to come into play as well. I'm really just playing with an idea here, but the idea that bullate leaves might be a response to one thing but then there are exceptions and what would it mean then would be at least partially calmed by the lack an additional evolutionary shift. Just musing on a Friday afternoon.
Aroid-L mailing list

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement