hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: pollinating Anth veitchii ?

Apologies for the delay in replying to Neil's comments.  I thought I would
check a few facts before replying as they started putting a few doubts into
my mind (being a newcomer to aroids had I misidentifed the plant ?, had I
miscounted the number of plants we had).  Well, after checking I am 99%
certain I am right.  The plants that were produced from the pollination were
distributed and after checking with everyone am assured that they are indeed
A. veitchii.  And the point I am most certain about is that we definitely
only had one plant (not various clones as was the case with MSBG).  Where I
think the misunderstanding has occurred is that the plant is an old mature
plant and as such produces several inflorescences when blooming.  Surely
pollen produced on one spadix could be ready at a time when the flowers are
receptive on another.  Neil may have thought there was only one inflorescence
in which case I understand his doubts.

Swansea Botanical Complex

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index