hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: [aroid-l] question about tubers vs. bulbs

  • Subject: Re: [aroid-l] question about tubers vs. bulbs
  • From: "Michael Marcotrigiano" mmarcotr@email.smith.edu
  • Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 14:46:02 -0400

In New England the flowering ones sometimes have such a short foliar
season that the resulting tuber is smaller the next year and does not
flower. Sometimes they split into multiple leaves and do not flower. I
had mine (not big enough I thought) in my onion cellar and just last
month thought a cat died in the kitchen. A trip to the basement revealed
an etiolated 10 foot stalk with a pale stinker at the end. New
discovery: Light is not necessary for the tuber to stink you out of your


Michael Marcotrigiano, Ph.D
Director of the Botanic Garden and Professor of Biological Sciences
Smith College
Lyman Conservatory, 15 College Lane
Northampton, MA 01063
email: mmarcotr@smith.edu
voice: 413-585-2741; fax: 413-585-2744
"Art is the unceasing effort to compete with 
     the beauty of flowers and never succeeding."
          Marc Chagall

>>> levin@pixar.com 05/06/03 02:55AM >>>
Hi Julius & Nancy,

No doubt there will be a flurry of responses on this topic, but in
the interest of providing yet another data point: my largest tuber
of Am. konjac (approx. 10" / 25 cm diameter) blooms like clockwork
every year in April.  It then takes a few months off before commencing
with its foliar phase, which here in the San Francisco Bay Area persists
until December or January before collapsing.  A few months more rest,
then the cycle repeats.  It's been 4 years so far, with little to no
from the above schedule.

-Dan Levin
Piedmont, CA

> << It may be several
> years before it re-builds enough 'strength'/size to bloom again. >>
> OH, my, I assumed that once it matured, it would bloom every year from
> on.  Boo hoo. I guess I should savor the moment then, huh.  It has
been in
> the 60's most of the week, so it has not been stinky yet.  Thank God!

Am. konjac is to my knowledge never an overwhelming stinker.
Think "dead cat" smell or thereabouts.  By comparison, poor Craig Allen
at FTG
has been subjected to the likes of "dead rhinoceros" lately.  It's all
relative, Nancy!

> Does anyone know how much the tubers are worth?

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index