hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: [aroid-l] Epipremnum

  • Subject: Re: [aroid-l] Epipremnum
  • From: "Julius Boos" ju-bo@msn.com
  • Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 05:41:16 -0400
  • Seal-send-time: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 05:41:18 -0400

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Eugene Hoh 
  To: aroid-l@lists.ncsu.edu 
  Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 5:52 AM
  Subject: Re: [aroid-l] Epipremnum

  dear folks,<<

  Dear Eugene,

  Thank you so very much for sharing the information with all of us, a most interesting letter!
  Pete has replied, so all of us are now clear as to the status of this intriguing group of cultivars of this 'GOOD' specie!
  It is so good belonging to this list where this rare information is available to the masses at a moment`s notice!   Thanks Pete!


  further to Julius's comments:
  indeed - I hope he will, too, please!

  I remember a similar discussion on aroid-L  - where Peter was explaining, in his earlier work on Epipremnum, he treated the plant as E. pinnatum cv. 'Aureum'  (see http://www.aroid.org/genera/epipremnum/eaureum.htm - the paper is on the IAS website). However, later, inspecting a wild plant from Moorea (E. mooreense , which he also
  included under E pinnatum), he decided that it matched the green form of E. pinnatum cv. 'Aureum' - and that it should indeed be a distinct species.

  There was then discussion from Wilbert re. which of the former names, (E. aureum or E. mooreense) should be reinstated for this species (expecting confusion if the common cultivar ended up as E. aureum  'Aureum').  I've found a link to this, in the aroid-L archives: http://www.hort.net/lists/aroid-l/jun01/msg00129.html

  My apologies to Peter (and Wilbert) if this is a poor summary, and if I've spoken on your behalf without asking...

  And sorry also, if this archive-trawling seems a bit obsessive and creepy...!
  I just happened to pay special attention to this topic - E. pinnatum is one of few well-known aroids native to Australia. Also I once spent a very long year deeply entangled in Monsteroids - as an honours student researching the leaf holes.... yet I still have an affinity for them.


  Eugene Hoh
  Sydney, Australia

  Julius Boos wrote:

  >   ----- Original Message -----
  >   From: Thomas.Croat@mobot.org
  >   To: aroid-l@lists.ncsu.edu
  >   Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 6:24 PM
  >   Subject: Re: [aroid-l] Epipremnum
  >   Dear Friends,
  >   I believe I recall the last time we spoke w/ Pete Boyce he said he had encountered this species of variegated  Epipremnum in the wild, and it was NOT a 'sport' of the all-green species as was previously thought, but a distinct and 'good' species.   He said then that he was going to work on a paper about this new location in the wild.
  >   I am certain that Pete will soon give us some good info.!

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index