|
Are you planning some work on this? The reason I
ask is that Susan Renner is currently investigating Arisaema and also the
complex of taxa around Typhonium; the latter is another genus with a peculiar
and quite possibly very ancient distribution.
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From:
t*@yahoo.com
To: aroid-l@gizmoworks.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 2:44
AM
Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] Aroid-L Digest,
Vol 39, Issue 39
Thank
you. Interesting info here. The close relatioinship between extant African
and Indian sp. could lead me to believe that Gondwana, or the Indian plate
at least would have been a center of origin? If there were any South
American sp. one could possible compare the Indian sp. to the SA species to
help get better estimates of age of diversification. Thanks for
sharing your thoughts on this.
Message: 2 Date: Mon, 15
Oct 2007 16:29:47 +0800 From: "Peter Boyce"
Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] Biogeography of
Arisaema To: "Discussion of aroids"
Message-ID:
<005b01c80f05$8c04b130$0201a8c0@ASPIRE> Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
In all probablility the ancestor of Arisaema and
Pinellia was transpangaen and the enormous Asian diversification happened
post India slamming into Asia to push up the Hmalaya, with the extant
species in Japan are derived from ancestral stocks standed on Japan when the
seaway between Japan and mainland Asia flooded.
The centres are not
definite known centres of origin, they are centres of modern diversity...
diversity in a region doesn't necessarily mean that the taxa there are
autocthanous (although they often are); it may be the result of rapid recent
evolution as seems to be the case with Schismatoglottis and Alocasia in
Borneo.
To my mind the most interesting Arisaema are those in Africa
and the Arabian gulf; the former seem to be isolates from a much once
greater range of diversity that probably underwent extensive extictions as
much of the lowland forest dried out and the mesophytic herbs retreated with
the forest into everwet montane areas. Interesting is that the exteant
African taxa are seemilgly most closely related to species from southern
Indian. On the other hand the Arabian Gulf species are a mix of otherwise
African isolates (A. bottae - elsewhere in the mountains of Somalia) and
fragments of once greater ranges of otherwise Chinese species (A.
flavum).
Peter ----- Original Message ----- From: Tindomul
Er-Murazor To: aroid-l@gizmoworks.com Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007
3:26 AM Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] Biogeography of Arisaema
Thank
you both. So I am to assume that the genus spread from China possibly
before the break up the continents (pangea or Eurasia/Laurasia). Interesting
that there are two secondary centers of origin. Thanks
again!!!
Message: 2 Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 07:24:18
+0800 From: "Peter Boyce" Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] Biogeography of
Arisaema To: "Discussion of aroids" Message-ID:
<005f01c80d27$03b81360$0201a8c0@ASPIRE> Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
North America and N. Mexico, montane central and
east subsaharan tropical Africa, southern Arabian Peninsular, southern Iran,
southern Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka, transhimalaya (secondary centre), S
China (primary centre); Japan (secondary centre); Korean Peninsular,
Indo-China (mainly the montane parts with N. Vietnam an extension of the SW
Chinese biome), Malesia as far east as Philippines.
Peter -----
Original Message ----- From: Tindomul Er-Murazor To:
aroid-l@gizmoworks.com Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 2:28
AM Subject: [Aroid-l] Biogeography of Arisaema
Hello,
I
am curious if anyone knows or can anyone tell me how to find out the
normal/natural distribution of Arisaema sp. in the world? Thank
you.
Catch up on fall's
hot new shows on Yahoo! TV. Watch previews, get listings, and more!
_______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing
list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
|