RE: Typhonium (giganteum) behaviour
>On Thu, 9 Oct 1997, Wilbert Hetterscheid wrote:
>> to this monster. And of course Typhonium venosum is an exception
>Did anyone else notice how subtly Wilbert slipped this name change in on
>us? (Not that we haven't been warned, several times.) Does this mean it's
>official now? Sauromatum is no more? Did both species wind up in
>Ah well, a Sauromatum by any other name would smell as foul.
>-- Steve Marak
I was just getting used to S. _venosum_ as opposed to guttatum! When will
it ever end???
I'm gonna have to stop growing these things.
Maritime Canada, Z 5b
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |