RE: Typhonium (giganteum) behaviour


>On Thu, 9 Oct 1997, Wilbert Hetterscheid wrote:
>
>> to this monster. And of course Typhonium venosum is an exception
>> too..............
>>
>
>Did anyone else notice how subtly Wilbert slipped this name change in on
>us? (Not that we haven't been warned, several times.) Does this mean it's
>official now? Sauromatum is no more? Did both species wind up in
>Typhonium?
>
>Ah well, a Sauromatum by any other name would smell as foul.
>
>Steve
>
>-- Steve Marak
>-- samarak@arachne.uark.edu

Damn!

I was just getting used to S. _venosum_ as opposed to guttatum! When will
it ever end???


I'm gonna have to stop growing these things.

Rand

Rand Nicholson
New Brunswick
Maritime Canada, Z 5b
<writserv@nbnet.nb.ca>




Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index