hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Happy Halloween - The November 7th Election

Community gardening is 50% gardening and 100% political. 
This message is political.

 I apologize in advance to anybody who believes that this website shouldn't
be used to promote politcal speach, but I'm doing it.
 At least I'm not trying to be funny ( a no-no on this listserve.) 
 If Dubya gets in, I believe that we can kiss real organic standards for
food production, FDA cheerleading for community gardening and tax credits
for businesses that give to foodbanks good bye. 

I do think Dubya might be good for a few more laughs than Al the Tin Man (
Dubya might even be a good drinking buddy when his wife isn't listening) but
I don't like the company he hangs with - bulldozer Rudy Giuliani is a big
supporter of his. 

I really don't expect that pollution emission controls will be strengthened
under Dubya, that anything annoying to the petrochemical industry will get
short shrift under his administration.

Think about Dubya on these topics: 

Acid rain? They're Canadians aren't they? 

 Frankenfoods?  Some folks are just afraid of technology.

 I voted for Nader last time but am voting for Al Gore this time because a
vote for Nader in this election is a vote for Dubya:

           by Gloria Steinem 
           President, Voters For Choice 

10. He's not running for President, he's running for federal matching funds 
for the Green Party! 

9. He was able to take all those perfect progressive positions of the past 
because he never had to build an electoral coalition, earn a majority vote, 
or otherwise submit to democracy. 

8. By condemning Gore for ever having taken a different position - for 
example, for voting against access to legal abortion when he was a 
Congressman from Tennessee - actually dissuades others from changing their 
minds and joining us. 

7. Nader is rightly obsessed with economic andcorporate control, yet he 
belittles a deeper form of control - control of reproduction, and the most 
intimate parts of our lives. For example, he calls the women's movement and 
the gay and lesbian movements "gonadal politics," and ridicules
use of 
the word "patriarchy," as if it were somehow less important than 
the World 
Trade Organization. As Congressman Barney Frank wrote Nader in an open 
letter, "your assertion that there are not important issue differences 
between Gore and Bush is either flatly inaccurate or reflects your view 
that...the issues are not important...since you have generally ignored these

issues in your career." 

6. The issues of corporate control can only be addressed by voting for 
candidates who will pass campaign-funding restrictions, and by conducting 
grassroots boycotts and consumer campaigns against sweatshops - not by 
voting for one man who will never become President. 

5. Toby Moffett, a longtime Nader Raider who also served in Congress, wrote 
that Nader's "Tweedledum and Tweedledee assertion that there is no 
difference between the major Presidential candidates would be laughable if 
it weren't so unsafe." We've been bamboozled by the media's practice of

being even-handedly negative. There is a far greater gulf between Bush and 
Gore than between Nixon and Kennedy - and what did that mean to history? 

4. Nader asked Winona LaDuke, an important Native American leader, to 
support and run with him, despite his likely contribution to the victory of 
George W. Bush, a man who has stated that "state law is supreme when to

comes to Indians," a breathtakingly dangerous position that ignores 
of treaties with tribal governments, long-standing federal policy and 
federal law affirming tribal sovereignty. 

3. If I were to run for President in the same symbolic way, I would hope my 
friends and colleagues would have the sense to vote against me, too, saving 
me from waking up to discover that I had helped send George W. Bush to the 
most powerful position in the world. 

2. There are one, two, three, or even four lifetime Supreme Court Justices 
who are likely to be appointed by the next President. Bush has made clear by

his record as Governor and appeals to the ultra-rightwing that his 
appointments would overturn Roe v. Wade and reproductive freedom, dismantle 
remedies for racial discrimination, oppose equal rights for gays and 
lesbians, oppose mandatory gun registration, oppose federal protections of 
endangered species, public lands, and water - and much more. Gore is the 
opposite on every one of these issues. Gore has made clear that his 
appointments would uphold our hard won progress in those areas, and he has 
outlined advances in each one. 

1. The art of behaving ethically is behaving as if everything we do matters.

If we want Gore and not Bush in the White House, we have to vote for Gore 
and not Bush - out of self-respect.  I'm not telling you how to vote by 
sharing these reasons. The essence of feminism is the power to decide for 
ourselves. It's also taking responsibility for our actions. Let's face it, 
Bush in the White House would have far more impact on the poor and 
vulnerable in this country, and on the subjects of our foreign policy and 
aid programs in other countries. Just as Clinton saved women's lives by 
rescinding the Mexico City policy by executive order as his first act as 
President - thus ending the ban against even discussing abortion if one 
received U.S. aid - the next President will have enormous power over the 
lives of millions abroad who cannot vote, plus millions too disillusioned to

vote here.  Perhaps there's a reason why Nader rallies seem so white, middle

class, and disproportionately male; in short, so supported by those who 
wouldn't be hurt if Bush were in the White House.  Think self-respect. Think

about the impact of our vote on the weakest among us. Then we can't go 


community_garden maillist  -  community_garden@mallorn.com

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index