hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

RE: Chemical opinion - follow up

  • Subject: RE: [ferns] Chemical opinion - follow up
  • From: "carol noel" <carolnoel2000@hotmail.com>
  • Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 16:47:18 +0000

Very interesting.  Thanks for translating that.  Definitely won't be
drinking it or feeding it to my dog!!![IMAGE]

Good to know inhalation is safe-ish.


>From: "Winter, Wim de" <Wim.dewinter@wur.nl> >Reply-To: ferns@hort.net
>To: <ferns@hort.net> >Subject: RE: [ferns] Chemical opinion - follow up
>Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:37:39 +0100 > > > What is the product your
using exactly...I can't find anythin on the web > > for indoor use...does
the lable specify that it has indoor uses? are you in > > the u.S.? >
>Nope. I  live in Holland. I use Provado Imidacloprid 2.5 % labeled for
indoor >and outdoor use. This is conform the national admission, which
should be (but >not necessary is) conform the European admission. From
the admission file I >cite (my translation and summary): > >
>Toxicokinetics > >Oral intake > >Imidaclopris was quickly taken up after
oral intake by rats and redistributed >over the body, except fatty
tissue, central nerve system and bones. The uptake >surpassed 90%. After
48 hrs it was excreted by urine (75-90% of dose) and >faeces (7-21%).
(...) The two primary decomposition pathways being oxydative >lysis of
the molecule and hydrolysis of the imidazoline ring followed by
>splitting off the water molecule. > > >Dermal en inhalatory intake > >No
quantitative data available. No dermal penetration study available.
>However, based on oral and dermal toxicity data it is deduced that
uptake will >be minimal. >Therefore, dermal uptake is assumed 10% for the
risk-assesment. > > >Toxicodynamics > >Acute toxicity > >Imidacloprid
should be considered harmful to toxic (based on rat and mouse
>respectively). In the inhalation study no effects were seen even in the
>highest achievable concentration. Imidacloprid is not irritating the
eyes nor >sensibilizing the skin. > >Tabel T.1 Acute toxiciteit van
imidacloprid > >Route Species LD50 (mg/kg body wt) > LC50 (mg/m3) >oraal
muis (m) 131 >oraal muis (f) 168 >oraal rat (m) 424 >oraal rat (f)
450-475 >dermaal rat > 5000 >inhalatoir rat > 69 (aerosol) >inhalatoir
rat > 5323 (dust) > > >Subacute/(semi)chronic toxicity > >[my summary:] 4
Weeks in dog feed doses 0, 200, 1000 en 5000 mg/kg feed. At >5000 mg/kg:
poor bastard; at 1000 mg/kg: some liver damage. >3 Weeks rabbit 0 to 1000
mg/kg body wt: no effects. >4 Weeks rat inhalation: (concentrations 0,
5,5, 30,5 and 191,2 mg/m3): NOAEL >of 5,5 mg/m3, based on liver and
hematology. > >Long term effects comparable. > >
>Genotoxicity/carcinogenity > >Imidacloprid has no effect on tumor
incidence in mice and rats. It is not >carcinogenous. Imidacloprid does
cause in-vitro chromosome damage. Because the >in-vivo test were
negative, it is considered not genotoxic. > >Reproduction toxicology /
teratogenity > >No effects on reproduction could be found. In the
teratogenity study, no >itrreversible changes were observed. >In the
2-generation reproduction study, the NOAEL (rat) was 100 mg/kg feed, or
>5 mg imidacloprid/kg body wt.day > > >Neurotoxicity > >Imidacloprid is a
nicotine cholinerg receptor agonist. > >In subacute and semichronic test
in dogs indications were found of >neuropathological effects (tremor,
ataxie). NOAEL 5 mg/kg body wt. > >In an acute study in rats effects were
observed (...)  NOAEL 20 mg/kg body wt >  (...) >The NOAEL for general
toxicological effects is 140 ppm in the feed, or 9.3 and >10.5 mg/kg
lg/dag (female resp. male) > >(... long) > >No model are available to
calculate acute effects of exposure to imidacloprid >used as Provado
Insect-pin. The exposure is estimated to be nihil, since: > > >1) contact
time is short and application infrequent, > >2) contact surface is
minimal > >3) gas pressure of imidacloprid is low  (no  inhalatory
exposure). > >No health effects are to be expected. > >[demime 1.01d
removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of
winmail.dat] >
>Support hort.net -- join the hort.net fund drive!
>http://www.hort.net/funds/ >

Support hort.net -- join the hort.net fund drive!

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement