Re: Lotus qstn

---

• To: g*@hort.net
• Subject: Re: [CHAT] Lotus qstn
• From: "Christopher P. Lindsey" lindsey@mallorn.com
• Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 07:34:19 -0600
• In-reply-to: 009b01c63621$1d74c390$fdb82246@daryl2005
• References: 00b001c6359c$03663cc0$80cef545@Kitty 9efc6657a4594205701cd2e1ebecfa00@verizon.net 001a01c635c5$8bbe6ce0$80cef545@Kitty 009b01c63621$1d74c390$fdb82246@daryl2005

> I'm betting they're not after a true lotus, but the Proven Winner Lotus 
> here:
> http://www.provenwinners.com/plants/default.cfm?doSearch=1&searchKeywords=lotus

I agree (for what *that's* worth).  :)

My first thought when I read Kitty's post was that Lotus corniculatus 
would look nice in that color combination and would tolerate the same 
conditions, but I couldn't see the tie-in to 'Lotus nelumbo'.

So, like you say, maybe she meant a true Lotus species after all (not 
Nelumbo) and doesn't have the specific epithet right.

Chris

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT

• References:
  • Lotus qstn
    • From: "K*"
  • Re: Lotus qstn
    • From: j* s*
  • Re: Lotus qstn
    • From: "K*"
  • Re: Lotus qstn
    • From: "D*"

• Prev by Date: Re: Lotus qstn
• Next by Date: RE: Problem with digest form of list.
• Previous by thread: Re: Lotus qstn
• Next by thread: Re: Lotus qstn