hybrids
- To: g*@hort.net
- Subject: [CHAT] hybrids
- From: "Kitty" k*@comcast.net
- Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 09:59:39 -0400
Interesting editorial in today's paper. The author cited research done by Reason magazine, National Geographic, CNW Marketing, Weekly Standard magazine. NG I've heard of but I know little about the other 3, so I wonder if you hybrid drivers might refute or agree with the various parts of it.
"...the market doesn't support them. They may be PC, but hybrids would get nowhere w/o govt and mfg subsidies. Car companies take losses on the cars. Hybrids cost about $6000 more to make than similar gas-powered cars and consumers won't shell that out - whatever their politics - and so buyers require the subsidies"... "..hybrids lack power..." "They don't get near the great gas mileage we're told they do"... "after a 2yr study on 'dust to dust' energy costs of the cars - meaning the energy to plan, build, sell, drive, and dispose of - the hybrids don't stack up well against gas-powered counterparts...don't last as long - around 100,000 miles vs 300,000 for traditional powered vehicles"
Kitty
neIN, Zone 5
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: hybrids
- From: j* s*
- From: j* s*
- RE: hybrids
- From: "B* &* B* M*"
- From: "B* &* B* M*"
- Re: hybrids
- From: "B* K*"
- From: "B* K*"
- Re: hybrids
- Prev by Date: Re: OT/Red stuff/various tastes
- Next by Date: Re: African Iris bloom!
- Previous by thread: Re: African Iris bloom!
- Next by thread: Re: hybrids