hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Heating the indoors, the yard outside,too...and aquestion...

  • To: <gardenchat@hort.net>
  • Subject: Re: [CHAT]Heating the indoors, the yard outside,too...and aquestion...
  • From: "Marge Talt" <mtalt@hort.net>
  • Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 02:37:12 -0400

Well, y'know, Auralie, that never actually occurred to me, so it's a
good thing you said it:-)  I don't have many conifers on account of
all the shade, so have not spent a lot of time reading up on them and
'dwarf' has always meant smaller to me, not just slower
growing....learn something new every day:-)

I'm not so frustrated as concerned since my guys are so lovely I
don't want to screw up their form, but they are totally eating those
front steps so I have got to get after them.  Have had this on my
list all year and no time for more than a few snips....they seem to
like the snipping and respond with faster growth!!

Marge Talt, zone 7 Maryland
Editor:  Gardening in Shade
Shadyside Garden Designs
Current Article: Corydalis
Complete Index of Articles by Category and Date

> From: Aplfgcnys@aol.com
> Marge, as I'm sure you don't need me to tell you, dwarf in these
> refers to rate of growth rather than ultimate size.  The definition
I have been 
> given is a growth-rate of 3-6" a year.  The Mugho pine we just had
to remove had 
> been there for 34 years, and despite my pruning, had reached 10
feet in each 
> dimension, which is just about on target.It sounds as if yours has
grown a bit 
> faster than that - 28 years shouldn't be more than 14 feet plus the
> 30" - 2 /12 feet more makes 16 1/2 feet,  That's still pretty big. 
Isn't it 
> frustrating when the problem arises just because the plants are
doing well.
> Auralie

Support hort.net -- join the hort.net fund drive!

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement