This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: Simon & Schuster rights grab
Margaret: My agent informs me that S&S is backing off from that proposition
at least for agented material. Best, Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "Margaret Lauterbach" <melauter@earthlink.net>
To: "Garden Writers -- GWL -- The Garden Writers Forum"
<gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: [GWL] Simon & Schuster rights grab
> I'd like to see some responses to Graham Rice's post of yesterday
> regarding Simon & Schuster's change in contract language. Hasn't it
> been customary to contract for first (and perhaps second) North
> American rights? Isn't this "you're fastened to this firm forever"
> redolent of Rodale? Thanks, Margaret Lauterbach
>
>>Simon & Schuster has changed its standard contract language in an
>>attempt to retain exclusive control of books even after they have
>>gone out of print. Until now, Simon & Schuster, like all other major
>>trade publishers, has followed the traditional practice in which
>>rights to a work revert to the author if the book falls out of print
>>or if its sales are low.
>>
>>The publisher is signaling that it will no longer include minimum
>>sales requirements for a work to be considered in print. Simon &
>>Schuster is apparently seeking nothing less than an exclusive grant
>>of rights in perpetuity. Effectively, the publisher would co-own
>>your copyright.
>>
>>The new contract would allow Simon & Schuster to consider a book in
>>print, and under its exclusive control, so long as it's available in
>>any form, including through its own in-house database -- even if no
>>copies are available to be ordered by traditional bookstores.
>>
>>There have been further announcements on this topic from the Authors
>>Guild, and from Simon & Schuster; these can be found on their website
>>at http://www.authorsguild.org.
>>
>>It just seems to me that as it gets more and more difficult to make a
>>living as a writer, this is another example of a publisher looking
>>after itself and not looking after its authors. Having had the rights
>>to a number of my older books revert to me - and one revised and
>>republished, with the possibility of revisions to two more also being
>>republished - I'm glad that the Authors Guild is taking this issue so
>>seriously.
>>
>>Graham Rice
>
> _______________________________________________
> gardenwriters mailing list
> gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/gardenwriters
>
> GWL has searchable archives at:
> http://www.hort.net/lists/gardenwriters
>
> Send photos for GWL to gwlphotos@hort.net to be posted
> at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gwlphotos
>
> Post gardening questions/threads to
> "Gardenwriters on Gardening" <gwl-g@lists.ibiblio.org>
>
> For GWL website and Wiki, go to
> http://www.ibiblio.org/gardenwriters
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.14/845 - Release Date: 6/12/2007
> 6:39 AM
>
>
_______________________________________________
gardenwriters mailing list
gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/gardenwriters
GWL has searchable archives at:
http://www.hort.net/lists/gardenwriters
Send photos for GWL to gwlphotos@hort.net to be posted
at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gwlphotos
Post gardening questions/threads to
"Gardenwriters on Gardening" <gwl-g@lists.ibiblio.org>
For GWL website and Wiki, go to
http://www.ibiblio.org/gardenwriters
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index