This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: [GWL]: There are no "idiotic questions."
- Subject: Re: [GWL]: There are no "idiotic questions."
- From: Samia Rose Topiary info@SRTopiary.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 16:12:38 -0700
- Content-length: 7259
- List-archive: <http://topica.com/lists/Gardenwriters/read>
Dear Carol,
I would like to say thank you for your response regarding idiotic
questions. Over the years, in this profession --- (more a professional
gardener than a writer) I found lots of great co-workers who became so
focused on gardening, horticulture, and Latin names that they thought of
little else. Often, I would hear them make jokes about what others did
not know ---- and "stupid" questions. These things happen without them
really realizing they were laughing at our audience-- our pay checks. This
has always troubled me.
A friend of mine in the PR dept. of a public garden once referred to those
of us who spoke in Latin as "Mulch Brains" and that label has stuck with
me ever since. Now that I am over 50 yrs. I find it easier to remind my
"Mulch Brain" friends to lighten up. Our subject is wide and we all have a
great deal of knowledge about a narrow slice of horticulture.
Pat
At 08:23 PM 10/17/01 +0000, Carol Deppe wrote:
>Stupidity is in the eyes of the beholder. In my 55-year life I have yet
>to hear an "idiotic" or stupid question.
>
>As garden writers we are basically teachers. Teaching in any form is
>hard work. It is by far easiest when we cultivate positive attitudes
>towards our students. Which of us has not had the horrible experience
>of some school teacher who greeted every question with contempt and made
>every student who didn't know an answer feel stupid? How much is
>learned with such a teacher? And how efficient or enjoyable is the
>process?
>
>We garden writers have a strictly NONCAPTIVE audience. If we cultivate
>contempt for an audience, we usually don't have it for long.
>
>One of my mentors, biochemist Arthur L. Koch, used to say: "I assume
>that my students are infinitely bright but infinitely ignorant." In
>reality, none of us are infinitely bright; but we aren't infinitely
>ignorant, either. So it all balances out. Arthur's Assumption helps me
>maintain a cheerful attitude towards ALL of my audience, at all levels
>of expertise.
>
>Garden writing is especially hard, because our audience spans such a
>great range of knowledge about any subject. We usually have to try to
>interest as large a part of that audience as possible. This means that
>we need to be able to start at the most beginning level on any subject,
>yet go fast enough, far enough, and in an interesting enough way so that
>we still retain and inform those who know a good bit about the subject
>to start with. It takes skill. It takes practice. And it takes a
>generous, welcoming, and nurturing attitude towards all our readers, and
>most especially towards the real beginners. The way to get and maintain
>that attitude is to plant, protect, and nurture it in ourselves.
>
>I did not react much to the first few postings on the subject "idiotic
>questions." But as the postings went on and on, I found myself feeling
>that they gave a nasty flavor to the GWL forum. I was a bit puzzled as
>to why I reacted so negatively. So I thought about it. Since the
>reasons get right to the core of the business of garden writing, I share
>them here.
>
>Humor is tricky. It works best when the teller of the joke is laughing
>at himself or his own group. When various of us told jokes about
>writers/editors/publishers, we were basically laughing at ourselves.
>But the "idiotic questions" line represents writers laughing at readers.
> It is "insiders" laughing at "outsiders."
>
>But the problem goes deeper. I think laughing at my readers is
>dangerous. It cultivates attitudes that are the opposite of the ones I
>want to cultivate.
>
>In addition, I feel that there really are no stupid questions. There
>are questions that show that the asker is ignorant about some particular
>area. And there are more and less helpful and insightful approaches to
>dealing with the questions that come our way.
>
>Few ordinary people know the pronunciations of botanical Latin these
>days. Most Ph.D.-level biologists don't, for example. If you know the
>pronunciations of botanical Latin, I'm happy for you. However, you
>probably don't know plenty of other things that are at least equally
>important, even about gardening and plants. The field is so large that
>all of us, however expert, are also abjectly ignorant in some areas.
>
>One "idiotic question" I found especially nonidiotic and fascinating was
>the one that went: "I work in a basement office. There are no windows,
>and they turn the heat off on weekends. What kind of plant will do well
>there?" This question really gets to the basics -- the basics of the
>minimal needs for various kinds of plants -- and the basics of human
>drives that make people want to grow things. Many plants can survive
>variable temperatures. A modest growing light for plants in this
>person's basement may or may not be required, depending upon what the
>overhead lights are. That may be all that is needed.
>
>That question brought back vivid memories -- memories of myself as a
>young molecular biologist with a rented apartment, no land, nothing but
>a big, beautiful, well-equipped, but sterile lab buried in the center of
>a building. There were no windows.
>
>Feeling drives I did not understand, I bought three big pots and planted
>three mail-order citrus trees. I took them to the lab and put them at
>the ends of the lab benches. As I recall, I had a book on indoor potted
>citrus. Come to think of it, that might have been the first garden
>writing I ever read. I didn't know whether the trees would grow under
>the flourescent overhead lights in the lab. But they did. They grew
>and thrived. All I did was water them. The Meyers lemon tree did
>especially well, and flowered long and frequently, filling the lab with
>its wondrous aroma. . . and it's intimation of other possible ways of
>working, living, and being.
>
>It was a start.
>
>------------------------------------------------------------
>For meals planning made easy, visit VeryBestMeals.com from
>Nestle. Choose from the 13,000+ recipes and 300+ meal
>plans. Generate grocery lists, save favorites, and enjoy
>culinary advice: http://click.topica.com/caaaduJbUrGSSbVWLEqf/Nestle
>------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Pass the word to garden writers, editors publishers, horticultural
>businesses about our list.
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------
Time is money. Save both with TopOffers!
Sign up for cool savings, hot deals, and free stuff,
and collect a SPECIAL BONUS right away!
It's easy! Click here:
http://click.topica.com/caaadN9bUrGSSbVSZwBf/Topica
-----------------------------------------------------------
Pass the word to garden writers, editors publishers, horticultural businesses about our list.
==^================================================================
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrGSS.bVSZwB
Or send an email To: Gardenwriters-unsubscribe@topica.com
This email was sent to: topica.com@spamfodder.com
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index