This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under GDPR Article 89.

Re: FW: Stop Media Monopoly


My two cents regarding media monopoly

I have been closely associated  with the newspaper business for over 30
years and did a 4 -year stint in TV as a freelancer for the local NBC
affiliate.

There is no question that the trend is to dumb down. The news holes are
shrinking in news papers. The trend is toward shorter articles with lots of
graphics. Trust me, the bean counters are running the show.

International news is almost non-existent in local newscasts. During the
sweeps TV news programs turn to violence and sex for ratings.

Detroit used to be one of the hottest radio markets in the country.  New
talent would kill to come to Detroit. Since the FCC has allowed the
ownership of multiple radio and TV stations, the quality of programming has
dropped like a stone.  Infomercial programming is on the rise.

Yes you can get news from around the world but you have to work at it.  And
you probably enjoy that or think it's worth the effort. Others don't or
haven't the time, so they depend on local programming. Forget newspapers,
the trend for years has been a decline in readership. Young folks depend on
radio and TV for most of their information. That's scary. What we have lost
in quality programming as a result of deregulation over the past decade is
gone for good. It could get worse, much worse.

Think about it.

Nancy

PS I think these exchanges are worthwhile. Let's not get testy and spoil it.




----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Loewer <thewildgardener@earthlink.net>
To: Garden Writers -- GWL -- The Garden Writers Forum
<gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 7:12 AM
Subject: Re: [GWL] FW: Stop Media Monopoly


> The problem is the media might be diverse but most of what's read by the
> average American is not! The major TV news networks feed out as much pap
as
> news and the minors, like Fox, are literally hate channels. On radio, Long
> John and others of his ilk have been replaced by entertainers who call the
> left mean and vindictive and preach about evolution and tell tales of
black
> helicopters run by the UN.  This is all fairly new. Twenty-five to thirty
> years ago, there were more in-depth magazines and columns,  not less, more
> news, not less, and more in-depth reporting. And, it's The New York Times,
> not the New York Times. Peter
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Duane Campbell" <dcamp911@juno.com>
> To: <gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org>
> Cc: <gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 10:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [GWL] FW: Stop Media Monopoly
>
>
> >
> > On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 16:27:55 -0700 "Lon J. Rombough"
<lonrom@hevanet.com>
> > writes:
> > > I make no comment on this one way or another.  I am passing this
> > > along
> > > because I felt it was germain to the list.
> >
> > Since you initiated this way off-topic topic, Ron, I assume you will
> > allow others to comment.
> >
> > I think it is important to know that this so-called "grassroots"
movement
> > was highly organized, primarily through the Internet, and that moveon is
> > a far left organization. You can approve or disapprove, but you should
> > know where it's coming from.
> >
> > I have been an avid consumer of news, particularly political news, for
> > nearly fifty years now. For most of that time my electronic media access
> > was limited to three television networks. Now there are somewhere
between
> > five and eight, maybe more, depending on how and what you count. I had a
> > local newspaper, and maybe the New York Times if I was willing to wait a
> > couple of days. Now I can wake up in the morning and read Le Monde or
the
> > London Times or Pravda and check out the BBC or the RNC or DNC or even
> > moveon.com. Newsbriefs from several sources are automatically delivered
> > to my email box every day. You may argue that not everyone has Internet
> > access, but just about everyone who is interested enough to want such
> > information does have it.
> >
> > The fact is that we have much more access to divergent opinion than we
> > ever had. I don't see what the problem is.
> >
> > D
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________
> > The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
> > Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
> > Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
> > _______________________________________________
> > gardenwriters mailing list
> > gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/gardenwriters
> >
> > GWL has searchable archives at:
> > http://www.hort.net/lists/gardenwriters
> >
> > Send photos for GWL to gwlphotos@hort.net to be posted
> > at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gwlphotos
> >
> > Post gardening questions/threads to
> > "Organic-Gardening" <organic-gardening@lists.ibiblio.org>
> >
> > For GWL website and Wiki, go to
> > http://www.ibiblio.org/gardenwriters
>
> _______________________________________________
> gardenwriters mailing list
> gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/gardenwriters
>
> GWL has searchable archives at:
> http://www.hort.net/lists/gardenwriters
>
> Send photos for GWL to gwlphotos@hort.net to be posted
> at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gwlphotos
>
> Post gardening questions/threads to
> "Organic-Gardening" <organic-gardening@lists.ibiblio.org>
>
> For GWL website and Wiki, go to
> http://www.ibiblio.org/gardenwriters


_______________________________________________
gardenwriters mailing list
gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/gardenwriters

GWL has searchable archives at:
http://www.hort.net/lists/gardenwriters

Send photos for GWL to gwlphotos@hort.net to be posted
at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gwlphotos

Post gardening questions/threads to
"Organic-Gardening" <organic-gardening@lists.ibiblio.org>

For GWL website and Wiki, go to
http://www.ibiblio.org/gardenwriters



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index