hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive


 Ah, the inevitable challenge from Mr Meyer.  Don't you have anything to

I'm trying to get my fall list out now, so I'm afraid I don't have too
much time to argue with you on this one.

Yes, 'Bridgewood 0017' is a name. I guess you got me on that one.

I put a number on a streaked plant once I decide it's worth keeping so I
can keep track of it's seedlings. I don't like to name them because they
are unstable and will eventually change to a stable plant. Actually the
plant is just labeled 0017, but if I do sell or give it to anyone, I
don't think that's sufficient and would attach "Bridgewood". And I also
don't care to debate whether 0017 is a number or a name. The reason I
asked the question is that 0017 is one of my best breeders but has not
stabilized yet and I don't want to give it a "real" name until it does.
It's just my preference, but I would prefer to name the stable plant and
refer to the streaked form as 'Stable Plant Streaked' or some such
thing.  That way, there is a connection between the streaked and stable
plant. '9944' stabilized and the margined form is now 'Graceland', '9944'
never left my nursery and it became 'Graceland Streaked' and anyone can
probably recognize the relationship.  If you disagree, which I'm sure you
do, that's fine.

I'm amazed by the prices people are paying for streaked plants that don't
look like anything special to me, and I wonder if it's because they've
been led to believe that streaking is unusual.  If I get around to
planting all the seeds I take this year, I can produce literally
thousands of streaked plants, but IMHO, unless they prove to be good
breeders or stabilize to something interesting, which most of them don't,
I don't see where the value comes from.  I hate to imply that I'm opposed
to separating a sucker from his/her money, but for some reason this trend
just bugs me. 

And so that's the reason I'm not a big fan of "naming" so many streakers.
Maybe I should just shut up and start selling them too.  I can use the
money as much as anyone.

And actually, I don't have the same standards for stable plants. I've
said many times before that I think don't think there's anything wrong
with introducing plants that are not fantastic new breakthroughs in the
world of hostas, as long as the plant is described as honestly as
possible. And before you write a 3 page tome disputing my logic, remember
I said I don't really care.  I know there are those who feel there are
too many hostas, I just don't agree.

As for 'Admiral Halsey', I agree with your implication that it shouldn't
have been introduced and haven't sold it for years.  Surprisingly though,
I still get calls from people in Minnesota and thereabouts asking if they
can buy it because they saw it in someone's garden up there.  Apparently
the creamy gold margin I saw when I named the plant is dependent on
temperature, and some people up there like the plant. In most years it's
just 'Patriot' around here. So sue me.  By the way, my catalog
description of 'Admiral Halsey', when I did sell it, indicated that the
color was much more apparent in cooler areas and ended with the
following: "I don't know if the world needs another 'Patriot' variant,
and I had planned to keep this one to myself, but people who have seen it
at the nursery have asked for it." 


Bill Meyer wrote:

  So Chick,
       I would assume that you are also not a big fan of naming margin,
  center, or solid-color plants if they were not truly unusual and outstanding
  for some reason too. Except maybe 'Admiral Halsey'. :-) The difference for
  streaked plants apparently is that must also give good offspring. It's not
  enough that they could be very attractive, have very stable streaking, be
  good growers, have a unique look, etc. Why do they have to meet standards
  higher than other types? Just wondering what the difference is in your eyes.
       Also, I'm not sure why you would think 'Bridgewood 0017' would not be a
  name. If it isn't a name, what is it?
                                       .......Bill Meyer

    Thanks Kevin,
    I have to admit that rules irritate me, but in this case I asked for it
    so I have only myself to blame.
    The reason I'm asking is that I am not a big fan of naming, nor or
    registering, streaked plants unless they are truly unusual and
    outstanding for some reason.  Obviously there are many who disagree
    because I see all kinds of plants being named that don't look any
    different than the hundreds of streaked plants I produce every year -
    thousands if you count the ones I throw out. I can't see any reason to
    introduce a streaked plant unless it's an outstanding breeder, and that
    doesn't mean just any streaked plant that will produce additional
    ordinary streaked plants.
    Anyway, I digress (does it seem that there's always a rant attached to
    my questions?).  I do have some streaked plants that I consider
    outstanding breeders and I have considered offering them for sale in the
    future.  Generally I number the seedlings I use for breeding and don't
    give them a name unless they stabilize into something I find
    interesting.  I think I was once told that I could not name a plant
    'Bridgewood 0017 ' legally because it didn't conform to the rules.  It
    would seem to me that if 'Apolo 13' is legal, then 'Bridgewood 0017'
    would be too.  Yes?
    Giboshiman@aol.com     wrote:

      In a message dated 8/28/2004 2:36:19 PM Eastern Standard Time,      chick@bridgewoodgardens.com       writes:
      Actually, I'm not bored.  Does it say anywhere in there whether  digits
      are allowed in hosta names?  That's really all I was wondering  about.

      Chick I know it scares you when I send anything that relates to rules but


      this case I think you will like the answer I am giving you to your


      The relevant sections ("articles") of the 2004 version of the code


      19.15 For a cultivar name to be established on or after 1 January 1996,


      epithet must
      consist of no more than 30 characters (Roman letters, numbers,  and


      punctuation marks or symbols) overall, excluding spaces and  the


      Ex. 24.  After 1 January 1996 a name with the  cultivar epithet "Madame


      Comtesse Oswald de Kerchove de Denterghem" could not  be established.
      19.16. A cultivar name may not be established if on or after 1 January


      its epithet
      consists solely of a single letter or solely of Arabic or  Roman


      Ex. 25.  Names containing the epithets "K", "400", and  "MMIV" cannot be
      established, but the epithets "Hundred", "10 Downing Street",  "451 Ocean
      Boulevard", "77 Sunset Strip", "Apollo 13", "Catch 22", "Henry VIII",

  "Pope Leo X",

      "4th July", and "Happy 21st Birthday" could be established.
      To sign-off this list, send email to       majordomo@hort.net       with the
      message text UNSUBSCRIBE HOSTA-OPEN

    To sign-off this list, send email to     majordomo@hort.net     with the

  To sign-off this list, send email to   majordomo@hort.net   with the

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index