hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: My Soap Box - Danger Will Robinson

  • Subject: Re: My Soap Box - Danger Will Robinson
  • From: "Bill Meyer" njhosta@hotmail.com
  • Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 14:34:05 -0500

Hi Chick,
         About time we got back to the interesting netherworld of your
reasoning! So, let me see if I have this straight --- If the nursery with
the hostas.com site set themselves up as ahs.com or americanhostasociety.com
that would be "pretty sleazy", but if they deliberately make their site look
like the AHS site (I think you must have noticed at least some similarity in
the decor) while using a domain name so similar that people might accidently
type it in (as Lu did with hostalibrary.com) there is "absolutely nothing
wrong" with that! That's a stretch even for your version of "business
ethics" isn't it? I suppose it could be a co-incidence that they just
happened to choose an identical look for their site. It's probably a
co-incidence that whoever that is at hostalibrary.com chose that name to put
up a links page too. Then, come to think of it, maybe that guy with the
phony seed wasn't doing anything wrong either because he had co-incidentally
named some of his own plants with those names. After all, he never said
whose 'Mustang Sally' the seed was from. Maybe he wasn't really doing
anything wrong at all, just conducting a little legitimate business. It
might be another co-incidence that Martha decided to sell off that stock
when she did too. Certainly she doesn't see how she did anything wrong. On
the other hand, why was she lying about it if she didn't think she did
anything wrong? Hmmmmm this business of pretending nothing is wrong with
this kind of behavior sure gets to be a slippery slope, doesn't it?
        As I'm sure you know, .com was the first and still is the most
widely recognized site name. You don't have to go too far back to when it
was only .net and .com. Many non-commercial sites use that extension by
preference beause it is always the first thing people think of. Hosta.com
was the first name that was looked at for the AHS site, but it was already
taken. To many people .com means the internet, not just internet commerce.
        As for fragrance, I'm talking about it as reality as in whether it
exists or not. Believe it or not, some things exist that cannot be used to
make money, so to you they would not be "practical".
                                               ........Bill Meyer

> Bill
> You're being goofy again.  Finally!  I was really getting bored.
> There is absolutely nothing wrong with the hosta.com site.  I won't speak
> to creativity, but your statement that they are trying to pretend to be
> the AHS is, as are most of your pronouncements, nonsense.  The AHS
> doesn't have a lock on the word "hosta", and there is absolutely nothing
> on the site that I saw that implies that it is anything other than a site
> selling hostas (.com does generally denote a commercial site, ya know).
> They've had this domain for a long time, and for all I know, they may
> have had it before hosta.org was started. I know that they were on the
> web before we were because I would have bought the domain if they didn't
> already have it.  If they were calling themselves ahs.com or
> ameicanhostasociety.com that would be pretty sleazy, but to think that a
> hosta nursery should not use the domain www.hosta.com is one of those
> ideas that I have begun to think of as BillMeyerisms.
> As to the other question, about fragrance, I guess it depends on whether
> you're talking about fragrance as a practical matter or as another
> BillMeyerism.  As a practical matter, it seems to me that if thousands
> and thousands of people have grown Halcyon, and nobody but Bill ever
> noticed that it was fragrant, then by definition, it is not fragrant.
> Simple as that.
> Chick
> Bill Meyer wrote:
>   Hi Lu,
>          I think when Jim Schwarz stopped paying for
www.hostalibrary.com   it
>   went back up for grabs. It was then bought by someone in Europe,
>   to Bob. He was concerned something like this would happen, but didn't
>   out until it was too late. My guess is that whoever is doing that won't
>   any money and will give it up soon.
>          If you think that's bad, have a look at the AHS site
>   and this one   www.hostas.com   What do you think - lack of creativity,
>   someone trying to pretend they are the AHS to improve their sales? The
>   graphics are free-use stuff included with Microsoft Frontpage so there's
>   theft involved, but is it really just a co-incidence?
>          As to what kind of person does
>   this stuff -- well I think
>   "opportunist" pretty much covers it. I think the younger generation
>   the word "user". They're the people who only care about what they can
>   for themselves out of people and things around them. I doubt they'd even
>   know why you're mad.
>   Meyer
>     OK, so I'm doing my usual database updating and come across a hosta
>     description is a little unclear. And again, as usual, I go to the
>     place on the internet, the Hosta Library to look at the picture, only
>     mistake, I type in .com instead of .org.
>     I could not believe my eyes. Some joker has set up a 'referral'
>   called
>     Hosta Library. It lists links to other websites on various topics.
>     obviously know that OUR Hosta Library gets lots of hits, and are
>   on
>     people making the same mistake that I did. They are selling their
>   to
>     companies in hopes that we will follow the links to their clients
>     Places like Pier One have subscribed.
>     I gotta tell you, it's made me angry. Makes me wonder if the real
>   is
>     hosta nurseries, and all this is just a cover. What kind of person
>   this?
>     Other than the obvious answer which is an opportunist. I just hope
>   everybody
>     realizes that by using the links at this site, whomever owns it get
paid a
>     commission. Makes me ill. What does this have to do with Hostas? Not a
>   DAMN
>     thing. This is in my book, as bad as those dinner time solicitation
>     calls.
>     I know at one time there was a nursery that bought the name, and had
>   linked
>     back to the REAL Hosta library. Makes me wonder what happened there?
>   should
>     have picked up that as part of the library, I would have gladly
>   for
>     it's annual maintenance fee!
>     Are there no ethics on the internet? I found this as offensive as some
>   the
>     spam we get here. Turns my stomach!
>     Getting off my soap box and kicking it in the corner!
>     Lu & Dan
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     To sign-off this list, send email to     majordomo@hort.net     with
>     message text UNSUBSCRIBE HOSTA-OPEN
>   ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>   To sign-off this list, send email to   majordomo@hort.net   with the
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index