hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: color blue in June

In my earlier post, change the word "varient" to "variant" in all instances.  "Varient" is not a sport of "variant", just a variant.

It is a scientific fact that the ability to spell or type is not related to one's level of intelligence.


Chick wrote:

AmberWaveG@aol.com wrote:
I still think to much is being read into all of this. ... As for Patriot, I
think I have about five different variant forms, but they are all still just
Then at what point are they not Patriot?  It seems to me that you have made your own determination of what is and is not a sport.  If plants that are visibly different are still the same plant, then why is Minuteman not Patriot, and why are both of them not just varient forms of Francee?  If we know the characteristics of  Francee, or any other hosta, then in my opinion, any plant that does not exhibit those characteristics in any significant way is not that hosta.

I have a sport of Francee that comes up with a bright chartreuse green center and then changes to the dark green common to Francee.  By early summer, there is no difference between this plant and Francee, but in my opinion it is not Francee.  If I want a plant of Francee, then I want Francee, not some varient, regardless of whether someone else thinks the varient is important or not.  In Bill Nash's example, to me, the all green form of On Stage is not H. montana because it is not the plant that has traditionally been distributed as H. montana.  It has a different leaf form, different habit, and presumably like On Stage, emerges much later.  While botanically, I assume that it is H. montana, it is not the standard H. montana and if I ordered H. montana, the green form of On Stage is not the plant I would be expecting.

The whole point of giving plants names is to be able to identify them.  It seems to me that hostas that are not the same should not have the same name.  In Jim's picture, I don't think these are just different forms of Guacamole, they are different plants.  The plants that are not the same as the plant that we know as Guacamole should either be given a different name or should be discarded.  The fact that hostas seem to be infinitely variable makes this more complicated than it is in most plants, so I guess there has to be a bit of leeway allowed, but my preference would be to have as little leeway as possible.


 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index