hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

RE: new introductions

  • Subject: RE: new introductions
  • From: michael shelton <wilddog_202@yahoo.com>
  • Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 14:45:23 -0700 (PDT)

Ran you and other hybridizers work to produce "garden
worthy" plants and your place and value in the
marketplace is a "good thing".

My question is who appointed you or the Growers
Association to decide what is ethical. Before you get
to busy arguing with me understand that i don't
disagree with what you say. 

As a hybridizer you must be able to get a premium
price for the plants that you work to bring to market.
But, since your position serves your self-interest
then there is a shadow on your position. Remember I
don't disagree with you.

The Growers Association of which I was a member has
such a varied agenda that it is limited to what it
will accomplish. Remember I don't disagree with what
they have accomplished. The Hosta of the Year is a
grand idea, but if one of your plants made it to that
position then your profit from it would go to the
tissue culture labs who would be producing the liners
and the growers who grow them on for retail.

The Growers Association has no authority to tell
anyone what to do even themselves. And I will aplaud
any thing they do that is worthwhile. You well know
that after a Growers Association meeting you can go
home and do anything you want.

The question of paying 50-100 or more for a plant has
nothing to do with what I'm addressing, which is since
you have no right to dictate or legislate what is
right or ethical then your opinion has the same weight
as mine. Snce it is in your self-interest to hold the
position you have "stick by your guns".

I AM saying that anyone who wants to take a different
path then I may well buy their untested plant and test
it myself if the price is right. Not the price that
you need for your plants. And I don't suggest that any
of your plants or priced to high or not worth your
asking price.

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index