Re: Plants with trademarked name
- Subject: Re: Plants with trademarked name
- From: C*
- Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 21:17:21 -0400
There are two separate sentences there, and it's probably not by accident. They
haven't said anything that isn't true. You just can't assume that one has
anything to do with the other.
Chick
Bob wrote:
> Hello
> Someone from the other list asked if plants sold by Monrovia with this
> statement 'Plants with trademarked name must be
> sold with label attached. Asexual reproduction of plants protected by
> the Plant Patent Act is
> prohibited'
> If this is true why can't everyone do the same. If it isn't true they
> could get into alot of trouble for attaching this label or making the
> statement. Maybe the second line is just that, a statement and nothing
> more but they try to make it seem like it makes the plant protected.
> --
> Bye
> Bob Bob Axmear 208 2nd St Ne Waukon, Ia 52172
> Hostasonline http://hostasonline.com/
> Gardensights Websites http://gardensights.com/
> Hosta Library http://hostalibrary.org/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
> message text UNSUBSCRIBE HOSTA-OPEN
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE HOSTA-OPEN
