Re: Observation
- Subject: Re: Observation
- From: B* M*
- Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 22:07:22 -0400
|
Hi Mary,
The reason I
think a large root system could be bad is that the roots seem adapted to the
soil they are growing in. That's why the roots on a plant grown in the ground
are so much different than the roots of one grown in a pot. If a plant is pushed
the way Chick described the Mobjack plant, they develop a huge root system, but
one that is adapted to the highly unusual Rain-Forest-like growing conditions in
the nursery. If these plants are taken home and put in the ground, some
varieties seem to have a lot of trouble adapting to the new conditions. I've
seen large, healthy looking gallon-pot size plants transplanted to the ground by
well-known hosta gardeners in June lose all their leaves within a month. These
plants haven't rotted, and they send up new top growth and get going again, but
by the following year they are much smaller than they would have been had they
adapted better.
The
artificially large root systems of heavily pushed plants are the exception to
the rule about larger root systems. Normally bigger is better, and if those
plants are not transplanted into the ground, it probably wouldn't be a problem
there. With seedlings I've found too that plants with similar size tops often
have widely varying sized roots under them. I wonder if some seedlings have more
efficient root systems. Have you noticed whether the size of the root
system on a seedling directly cooresponds to how it grows
eventually?
.............Bill Meyer
|
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Observation
- From: "M* C*"
- From: "M* C*"
- RE: Observation
- References:
- RE: Observation
- From: "M* C*"
- From: "M* C*"
- RE: Observation
- Prev by Date: RE: Observation
- Next by Date: congratulations per pound
- Prev by thread: RE: Observation
- Next by thread: RE: Observation