hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: 85 of Alex Malloy's intros and NRs

bob wrote:

>         I am trying to look at it like there is no limit or standards that
> anybody follows so each person sets their own.

You can put any limits or standard you like on the library, but as far as
registration goes, there are none.  Under the current thinking, with which I
agree, there can be no limits or standards.

Theoretically, the ideal is for every hosta to be registered if it has been or
will be distributed.  Since you cannot put limits on what is introduced, you
cannot put limits on what is registered. I guess if someone tried to go to
absurd extremes, the registrations could be denied, but I don't know how far you
would have to go. You can try to talk some sense into people, but if you really
want a record of all hostas, you have to register them.

People just have to get used to the idea that registration means nothing more
than that someone has decided to record the existance of a hosta.


To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index