This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: advice sought
- To: r*@eskimo.com
- Subject: Re: advice sought
- From: "* W* <c*@cyberhighway.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 09:43:46 -0700
- References: <199802241636.LAA31116@earthma.zelacom.com>
- Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 08:47:48 -0800 (PST)
- Resent-From: rose-list@eskimo.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"p50O11.0.Yg3.mclyq"@mx2>
- Resent-Sender: rose-list-request@eskimo.com
Isabelle Hayes wrote:
>
> Greetings: I recently ordered a number of old roses from Wayside Gardens,
> including the following:
>
> Souvenir de Malmaison
> Cecile Brunner climbing
> Charles de Mills
> Reine des Violettes
>
> I did this because I read in a book about old roses and climbing vines, that
> these were among the longest cultivated, hardiest, disease resistant,
> prolific, prettiest, etc. Can anyone confirm my expectations with their own
> experience?
>
> Or, and hopefully not, anything to the contrary?
>
> I suppose it would have been better to ask this advice before ordering, but
> I was carried away by the catalogue.
>
> Isabelle Hayes
Dear Isabelle -
You're right to question a catalog, but this time you did all right.
There's an old saying, "No one lies as glibly and easily as the writer
of a catalog."
Anyhow, you chose terrific roses. I personally have been disappointed
with the stock coming from that particular vendor, but if you get
halfway-good roses to begin with, you will know a long and happy
relationship with your new friends.
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index