This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: advice sought
- To: Carol Wallace <g*@columnist.com>
- Subject: Re: advice sought
- From: j* <j*@indiana.edu>
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 13:27:23 -0500 (EST)
- In-Reply-To: <34F30258.3B1C6ABC@columnist.com>
- Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 10:27:37 -0800
- Resent-From: rose-list@eskimo.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"_Y3_42.0.bD6.N4nyq"@mx1>
- Resent-Sender: rose-list-request@eskimo.com
On Tue, 24 Feb 1998, Carol Wallace wrote:
> What zone are you in, Isabelle? I think you chose beautiful roses, but in my
> zone 5b/6 garden I have not had great luck with climbing Cecile Brunner
Couldn't agree more. The average minimum temperature probably affects
roses more than most perennials for temperate zones. The difference in
appearance between a Mr. Lincoln here in zone 5, and the same in
California is remarkable. Whereas there is more to consider than just the
average minimum temperature for most perennials (the RH, the soil etc...),
probably for roses the zone number just about says it all. It would be
helpful to me as a reader if participants automatically included their
zone. Thanks, Judy Sylvester, zone 5.
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index