This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: New Rose beds
- To: r*@eskimo.com
- Subject: Re: New Rose beds
- From: p*@juno.com (Patricia H.)
- Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 21:20:18 -0500
- References: <3.0.5.32.19980527102911.008dda10@mail.reach.net>
- Resent-Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 00:38:11 -0700
- Resent-From: rose-list@eskimo.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"FSLyb2.0.wV2.PNcRr"@mx1>
- Resent-Sender: rose-list-request@eskimo.com
I read somewhere once that a new bed of soil should be given about a year
to both settle, *and* to give microorganisms a chance to develop
('specially if you've imported your garden soil).
Sort of like aging compost, I'd think.
I've gotta say -- I've had better luck planting in established beds than
new ones; not just roses, but lots of other types of plants as well.
Patty
zone 8b
Louisiana
-----------------
On Wed, 27 May 1998 10:29:11 -0400 rcdavis@reach.net writes:
>At 11:33 AM 5/26/98 -0700, you wrote:
>>I have never heard that. I can't image why.
>>Anyone have a clue ?
>>Perhaps because of settling of new soil.
>>Guess I could have waited for the rain to
>>press it down... Not...
>
>I have heard however, that you shouldn't plant roses in old beds where
>roses have grown before. This is due to the fact that roses are very
>heavy
>feeders, and the soil would be depleated of vital nutrients.
>
>Caroline
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index